TABLE 2.
Protein family content predicted in the non-core genome of the four Phytophthora ramorum lineages
| Protein family | No. of effectors in lineagea
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EU1 | EU2 | NA1 | NA2 | |
| Ester hydrolasesb | 1 (1) | |||
| Peptidasesb | 1 (1) | 2 | 4 (1) | |
| RxLR | 2 (2) | 1 | 2 (2) | |
| ABC transporter | 1 (1) | 1 | 1 | |
| Kinases | 1 (1) | |||
| Methyltransferases | 3 (3) | 1 | 1 (1) | 2 (2) |
| Glycoside transferasesb | 1 | |||
| Helicases | 2 | 1 (1) | ||
| Transposons | 3 | 6 | 8 (1) | 7 (1) |
| Other hypothetical proteins | 10 (4) | 5 (1) | 17 (5) | 22 (8) |
| Putative proteins without homologs | 5 (2) | 3 (3) | 2 (1) | 5 (1) |
| Total | 26 | 17 | 34 | 44 |
a
Results for putative effector families according to van Damme et al. (113) are in boldface, and numbers of models in a category that were predicted as putative effectors with EffectorP (114) are shown in parentheses.
b
Protein models with homologs potentially playing direct or indirect role in degradation of plant cell wall component.