Table 4.
Assessment of the relevance of the 9 quality principles (Q2) for one’s own usage decision (for N=123 students).
| Item | Very important, n (%) |
Important, n (%) |
Part/part, n (%) |
Less important, n (%) |
Unimportant, n (%) |
Do not know, n (%) |
No information, n (%) |
| Practicality | 62 (50.4) | 46 (37.4) | 8 (6.5) | —a | 2 (1.6) | 5 (4.1) | — |
| Risk adequacy | 91 (74.0) | 11 (8.9) | 9 (7.3) | 1 (0.8) | 2 (1.6) | 7 (5.7) | 2 (1.6) |
| Ethical soundness | 68 (55.3) | 37 (30.1) | 11 (8.9) | 3 (2.4) | 2 (1.6) | 1 (0.8) | 1 (0.8) |
| Legal conformity | 82 (66.7) | 26 (21.1) | 5 (4.1) | 4 (3.3) | 1 (0.8) | 4 (3.3) | 1 (0.8) |
| Content validity | 105 (85.4) | 12 (9.8) | 2 (1.6) | 1 (0.8) | 1 (0.8) | 2 (1.6) | — |
| Technical adequacy | 3 (2.4) | 48 (39.0) | 47 (38.2) | 3 (2.4) | — | 3 (2.4) | 3 (2.4) |
| Usability | 80 (65.0) | 34 (27.6) | 8 (6.5) | — | — | 1 (0.8) | — |
| Resource efficiency | 36 (29.3) | 42 (34.1) | 24 (19.5) | 10 (8.1) | 3 (2.4) | 8 (6.5) | — |
| Transparency | 56 (45.5) | 39 (31.7) | 19 (15.4) | — | 1 (0.8) | 6 (4.9) | 2 (1.6) |
aNo corresponding answer was given.