Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 1;10(4):385. doi: 10.3390/polym10040385

Table 1.

Optimization of reaction conditions a.

graphic file with name polymers-10-00385-i001.jpg
Entry Catalyst Base Solvent Yield (%) b
1 CS@CuSO4 none H2O 30
2 CS@Cu(OAc)2 none H2O 22
3 CS@Cu(acac)2 none H2O 41
4 CS@Cu(acac)2 Na2CO3 H2O 50
5 CS@Cu(acac)2 K2CO3 H2O 65
6 CS@Cu(acac)2 B1 H2O 40
7 CS@Cu(acac)2 B2 H2O 38
8 CS@Cu(acac)2 B3 H2O 86
9 CS@Cu(acac)2 B4 H2O 92
10 - B4 H2O NR
11 CS@Cu(acac)2 B4 DCM NR
12 CS@Cu(acac)2 B4 THF NR
13 CS@Cu(acac)2 B4 Et2O NR
14 CS@Cu(acac)2 B4 Toluene NR
15 CS@Cu(acac)2 B4 MeOH 25
16 CS@Cu(acac)2 B4 EtOH 8
17 c CS@Cu(acac)2 B4 H2O 89
18 d CS@Cu(acac)2 B4 H2O 91
graphic file with name polymers-10-00385-i002.jpg

a Reaction conditions: substrate 2 (0.3 mmol), Me2PhSi-B(pin) 1 (1.2 equiv.), catalyst (5 mol % Cu loading), base (6 mol %), H2O (2 mL), room temperature, air, 12 h; b Isolated yield of product; c 2.5 mol % Cu loading was used; d Performed under Ar atomosphere.