Table 3.
Comparison of the morphological data with those reported in literature
| Asian | Caucasian | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | ML | AP | Authors | ML | AP |
| Vaidya et al., 200013 (Indian) | 61.09 (male) | Lonner et al., 200810 (American) | 76.9 (male) | 62.27 (male) | |
| 55.58 (female) | 67.49 (female) | 56.32 (female) | |||
| Cheng et al., 200914 (Chinese) | 74.4±2.9 (male) | 66.6±2.4 (male) | Yue et al., 20117 (American) | 74.6±3.9 (male) | 59.6±3.2 (male) |
| 66.8±3.11 (female) | 61.0±24.6 (female) | 65.4±1.4 (female) | 55.4±2.8 (female) | ||
| Ha and Na, 201215 (Korean) | 74.8 (male) | 66.3 (male) | |||
| 68.2 (female) | 60.8 (female) | ||||
| Yue et al., 20117 (Chinese) | 72.7±3.8 (male) | 56.5±2.5 (male) | |||
| 64.4±2.6 (female) | 52.8±2.6 (female) | ||||
| Our study | 72.74±4.45 (male) | 49.62±3.86 (male) | |||
| 63.592.61 (female) | 45.11±4.4 (female) | ||||
ML=Mediolateral, AP=Anteroposterior