Table 2. Change in selectivity with local vs. distant return.

The first column indicates the fitted slope, and the confidence interval on the slope obtained by resampling, for local return vs. distant return selectivity, using cell pairs composed of one near cell and one intermediate cell (data from Fig. 3). The second column indicates the slopes for pairs composed of one near cell and one far cell. Details as in Table 1.

LR vs. DR selectivity measured by thresholds mean (90% confidence interval)
	near vs. intermediate	near vs. far
retina 1	1.47 (1.39, 1.56)	1.37 (1.31, 1.43)
retina 2	1.57 (1.28, 1.91)	1.32 (1.12, 1.55)
retina 3	1.09 (0.980, 1.20)	1.04 (0.997, 1.10)
retina 4	1.03 (1.01, 1.05)	1.02 (1.01, 1.03)
pooled	1.29 (1.01, 1.73)	1.10 (0.996, 1.34)