Table 1.
Drug A | Drug B | Network separation (sAB) | Network pattern | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Drug combinations | ||||
Hydrochlorothiazide | Nifedipine | 0.14 | P2 | Synergistic reduction of blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. |
Hydrochlorothiazide | Nebivolol | 0.29 | P2 | Hydrochlorothiazide and Nebivolol reduce both diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure vs. baseline in patients. |
Captopril | Oxprenolol | 0.33 | P2 | Effectively control blood pressure without any negative metabolic effects. |
Hydrochlorothiazide | Telmisartan | 0.36 | P2 | Co-treat hypertension. |
Hydrochlorothiazide | Amiloride | 0.42 | P2 | Prevent glucose intolerance and improve blood pressure control compared with monotherapy. |
Captopril | Isradipine | 0.49 | P2 | Co-treatment is more effective than captopril given with a low dose of hydrochlorothiazide. |
Hydrochlorothiazide | Spironolactone | 0.59 | P2 | Co-treat hypertension and water retention in patients with congestive heart failure or nephrotic syndrome. |
Adverse drug interactions | ||||
Nadroparin | Spironolactone | −0.11 | P1 | Increased hyperkalemic activities by co-treatment. |
Hydrochlorothiazide | Diazoxide | −0.90 | P1 | Increased blood sugar more than expected. |
Network proximity and drug–drug–disease network pattern analyses for 9 selected drug pairs involving anti-hypertensive drugs on the hypertension disease module. Two network patterns, Overlapping Exposure (P1) and Complementary Exposure (P2), are illustrated in Fig. 2a, b