Table 1.
WT |
YAP-CHKO |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sham | TAC | Sham | TAC | |
n | 12 | 14 | 12 | 14 |
DSEP WT (mm) | 0.79 ± 0.05 | 0.81 ± 0.10 | 0.77 ± 0.09 | 0.83 ± 0.09 |
LVEDD (mm) | 3.44 ± 0.30 | 3.35 ± 0.24 | 3.58 ± 0.28 | 3.89 ± 0.29a |
DPWT (mm) | 0.67 ± 0.07 | 0.72 ± 0.11 | 0.73 ± 0.06 | 0.73 ± 0.12 |
LVESD (mm) | 2.30 ± 0.35 | 2.26 ± 0.35 | 2.57 ± 0.44 | 3.18 ± 0.37 |
EF (%) | 68.4 ± 13.1 | 66.5 ± 15.4 | 62.1 ± 12.1 | 44.2 ± 14.0a,b |
%FS (%) | 33.12 ± 9.53 | 32.18 ± 11.23 | 28.45 ± 7.97 | 18.27 ± 7.18a,b |
a p < 0.05 versus WT-TAC is shown.
b p < 0.05 versus YAP-CHKO-SHAM is shown. Statistical analyses were conducted with ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was conducted with Tukey's test.