Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 28;21(2):e12945. doi: 10.2196/12945

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Comparisons groups and studies Learning modalities compared Number and types of participants Field of study Outcomes
DPBLa vs traditional PBLb

Alverson et al 2008 [44], RCTc, United States VRd PBL vs traditional PBL 36 medical students (year unspecified) Traumatic head injury Knowledge

Bowdish et al 2003 [22], RCT, United States Online PBL vs traditional PBL 150 medical students (first year) Human physiology Knowledge

Dennis 2003 [39], RCT, United States Online PBL vs traditional PBL 34 medical students (second year) Pregnancy-associated urinary incontinence Knowledge

Kong et al 2009 [21], RCT, China Online PBL vs traditional PBL 90 medical students (year unspecified) Ophthalmology Knowledge

Li et al 2013 [31], RCT, China Offline PBL vs traditional PBL 120 medical students (fourth year) Dermatology Knowledge, Skills

Moeller et al 2010 [43], RCT, Germany Online PBL vs traditional PBL 237 medical students (year unspecified) Multidisciplinary Knowledge, Skills

Sobocan et al 2017 [42], RCT, Slovenia VPe-based PBL vs traditional PBL 34 medical students (third year) Internal medicine Knowledge

Taradi et al 2005 [40], RCT, Croatia Online PBL vs traditional PBL 121 medical students (second year) Biochemistry (acid-base physiology) Knowledge
DPBL vs traditional learning

Kong et al 2009 [21], RCT, China Online PBL vs traditional learning (lecture) 90 medical students (year unspecified) Ophthalmology Knowledge

Li et al 2013 [31], RCT, China Offline PBL vs traditional learning (lecture) 120 medical students (fourth year) Dermatology Knowledge

Schutte et al 1997 [41], RCT, The Netherlands VR PBL vs traditional learning (textbook) 68 medical students (first year) Genetics (global structure of DNA) Knowledge

aDPBL: digital problem-based learning.

bPBL: problem-based learning.

cRCT: randomized controlled trial.

dVR: virtual reality.

eVP: virtual patient.