Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 13;19:61. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2472-1

Table 2.

Level of evidence

Variable Effect(RR/MD/SMD) 95%CI P I2(%) P(X2 test) Statistical Method Studies (N) Sample size (N) Level of evidence
Pregnancy rate 1.23 1.13, 1.34 < 0.00001 30 0.16 Fixed effects models 11 2909 Very low
Endometrial pattern 1.47 1.27, 1.70 < 0.00001 18 0.30 Fixed effects models 6 552 Moderate
Endometrial thickness 0.41 0.11, 0.72 0.008 72 0.0004 Random effects models 9 666 Low
Electroacupuncture 0.83 0.22, 1.43 0.008 83 0.003 Random effects models 3 298 Low
Acupuncture 0.20 −0.01, 0.40 0.06 0 0.56 Random effects models 6 368 Moderate
Embryo transfer rate 2.04 1.13, 3.70 0.02 0 0.85 Fixed effects models 2 124 Very low
RI −0.08 − 0.15, − 0.02 0.01 99 < 0.00001 Random effects models 5 437 Very low
With moxibustion −0.01 − 0.02, − 0.00 0.0006 0 0.90 Random effects models 2 154 Low
Without moxibustion −0.15 − 0.28, − 0.01 0.03 99 < 0.00001 Random effects models 3 283 Very low
PI −2.39 −3.85, −0.93 0.001 97 < 0.00001 Random effects models 5 437 Very low
With moxibustion −0.54 −0.86, − 0.22 0.0010 0 0.60 Random effects models 2 154 Low
Without moxibustion −3.69 −5.93, −1.45 0.001 97 < 0.00001 Random effects models 3 283 Very low
S/D −0.60 −0.89, − 0.30 < 0.0001 15 0.28 Fixed effects models 2 187 Low