Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2019 Jan 1;254(1):104–112. doi: 10.2460/javma.254.1.104

Table 2—

Proportionate mortality ratios for suicide for the 398 decedents in Table 1.

Position type Males (n = 326) Females (n = 72)
No. observed No. expected PMR (95%CI) No. observed No. expected PMR (95%CI)
All 326 156.3 2.1* (1.87–2.32) 72 20.7 3.5* (2.73–1.39)
Clinical 261 117.5 2.2* (1.96–2.51) 52 15.4 3.4* (2.52–1.42)
Companion animal 167 61.6 2.7* (2.32–3.16) 42 12.3 3.4* (2.46–1.61)
Food animal 32 18.8 1.7* (1.16–2.40) < 5 < 5 4.9 (1.00–14.19)
Mixed animal 16 9.7 1.7 (0.94–2.68) < 5 < 5 3.6 (0.75–10.61)
Equine < 5 < 5 1.2 (0.49–2.50) < 5 < 5 1.2 (0.03–6.61)
Other < 5 < 5 4.0 (0.48–14.42) < 5 < 5 0 (—)
Not specified 37 21.1 l.8 (1.24–2.42) < 5 < 5 3.6 (0.75–10.57)
Nonclinical 56 31.2 1.8* (1.36–2.33) 11 2.2 5.0* (2.50–8.98)
Unknown 9 7.7 1.2 (0.54–2.23) 9 3.0 3.0* (1.36–5.65)

The PMRs were generated by LTAS software with 95% CIs and 2-sided P values on the basis of an assumed Poisson distribution; values > 1.0 indicate that the proportion of deaths by suicide is greater than that for the general US population during the study period, with values of P < 0.05 considered significant.

*

P < 0.01.

P < 0.05.

See Table 1 for remainder of key.