Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(2):427–437. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161294

Table 3.

Comparisons of demographic and clinical variables between subjects with baseline CDR Global score of 0 and 0.5

Variables All sample Baseline CDR
Baseline CDR 0
Baseline CDR 0.5
Baseline CDR 0
Baseline CDR 0.5
0 0.5 Cognitive stable Cognitive decline Cognitive stable Cognitive decline Non-completers Completers Non-completers Completers
Subject, n 644 497 147 435 62 101 46 186 311 67 80
Age, M (SD) 79.5 (3.6) 79.4 (3.6) 79.8 (3.6) 79.3 (3.6) 80.2 (3.9) 79.3 (3.5) 81.0 (3.6)* 80.0 (4.2) 79.0 (3.2)* 80.3 (4.0) 79.4 (3.2)
Male, % 41.8 39.6 49.0* 40.2 35.5 51.5 43.5 37.1 41.2 55.2 43.8
White, % 77.2 77.3 76.9 79.5 61.3* 76.2 78.3 71.5 80.7* 68.7 83.8*
Married, % 55.9 54.3 61.2 55.2 48.4 63.4 56.5 45.7 59.5* 68.7 55
Education (y), M (SD) 15.0(3.1) 15.0 (3.0) 14.8 (3.4) 15.2 (2.9) 14.0 (3.4)* 14.8 (3.5) 14.7 (3.1) 14.5 (3.0) 15.3 (2.9)* 14.1 (3.6) 15.4 (3.1)*
Living with study partners, % 49.1 47.5 54.4 46.9 51.6 56.4 50 41.9 50.8 62.7 47.5
Subject’s CFI at baseline 2.4 (2.3) 2.0 (1.9) 3.8 (2.9)* 1.9 (1.8) 2.7 (2.3)* 3.4 (2.8) 4.5 (3.1)* 2.4 (2.1) 1.8 (1.8)* 4.5 (3.3) 3.2 (2.4)*
Study partner’s CFI at baseline 1.5 (2.1) 1.0 (0.2) 3.0 (2.9)* 0.9 (1.4) 1.6 (2.1)* 2.8 (2.8) 3.5 (2.9) 1.1 (1.6) 1.0 (1.5) 3.6 (3.2) 2.5 (2.5)*
CDR-SOB, M (SD) 0.3 (0.5) 0.1 (0.2) 1.0 (0.5)* 0.1 (0.2) 0.2 (0.2)* 1.0 (0.5) 1.2 (0.5)* 0.1 (0.2) 0.1 (0.2) 1.2 (0.6) 0.9 (0.5)*
mMMSE, M (SD) 95.3 (3.7) 95.6 (3.5) 94.1 (3.9)* 96.1 (3.2) 92.2 (3.8)* 94.7 (3.9) 92.8 (3.8)* 94.8 (3.8) 96.1 (3.2)* 93.0 (4.4) 94.9 (3.3)
FSCRT, M (SD) 47.8 (0.5) 47.8 (0.5) 47.7 (0.7)* 47.9 (0.4) 47.6 (0.8)* 47.8 (0.5) 47.5 (0.9)* 47.8 (0.6) 47.9 (0.4) 47.6 (0.8) 47.8 (0.5)
GDS, M (SD) 1.5 (2.0) 1.3 (1.8) 2.4 (2.4)* 1.2 (1.8) 1.6 (2.3) 2.3 (2.3) 2.7 (2.7) 1.6 (2.0) 1.1 (1.7)* 2.9 (2.4) 2.0 (2.4)*
*

p ≤ 0.05.