Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 3;123(4):715–726. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy204

Table 2.

Morphological and anatomical traits in the leaves of soybean, French bean and azuki bean before and after the experimental treatments

6 DAT 10 DAT 15 DAT
Ct0 Ct De LN LNDe HL Ct De Ct De
LMA (g m–2) Soybean 33.8 ± 2.5 42.9 ± 6.0* 61.7 ± 8.5* 57.6 ± 6.7* 66.8 ± 8.5* 63.4 ± 7.7** 53.3 ± 6.4 89.3 ± 4.3** 65.7 ± 7.5 124.1 ± 11.3
French bean 45.4 ± 4.0 42.3 ± 8.3n.s. 51.8 ± 12.2* 69.9 ± 14.7* 74.6 ± 9.6* 64.0 ± 5.9
Azuki bean 44.5 ± 5.7 62.1 ± 13.1n.s. 67.5 ± 7.5n.s. 65.8 ± 8.1n.s. 75.8 ± 8.3* 81.4 ± 15.2
sLMA (g m–2) Soybean 27.0 ± 1.3 33.0 ± 2.9* 51.7 ± 5.8* 35.0 ± 3.8* 46.8 ± 4.6* 43.3 ± 4.3** 35.9 ± 3.3 69.7 ± 3.3** 38.9 ± 3.1 88.0 ± 5.2
French bean 33.9 ± 1.8 31.6 ± 5.7* 39.6 ± 7.1n.s. 33.7 ± 5.2n.s. 38.6 ± 6.2* 46.3 ± 3.0
Azuki bean 30.2 ± 2.3 37.7 ± 5.3n.s. 43.3 ± 3.3n.s. 35.1 ± 3.0n.s. 40.4 ± 3.8* 48.5 ± 7.0
Leaf thickness (μm) Soybean 197 ± 15 283 ± 31* 344 ± 32n.s. 248 ± 27n.s. 296 ± 15n.s. 295 ± 30n.s. 313 ± 47 341 ± 36** 273 ± 21 416 ± 21
French bean 253 ± 42 379 ± 60n.s. 425 ± 67* 287 ± 28n.s. 326 ± 94n.s. 420 ± 49
Azuki bean 230 ± 28 247 ± 37* 301 ± 18n.s. 224 ± 20n.s. 235 ± 25n.s. 253 ± 33
Intercellular air space (%) Soybean 33.0 ± 4.1 31.3 ± 3.1* 25.3 ± 2.8n.s. 31.2 ± 6.4n.s. 30.7 ± 3.5n.s. 28.2 ± 5.3n.s. 29.0 ± 5.1 27.4 ± 5.2** 31.5 ± 5.5 25.3 ± 3.6
French bean 25.6 ± 3.8 30.7 ± 2.8n.s. 31.1 ± 4.1* 24.4 ± 5.5n.s. 28.0 ± 1.9* 22.5 ± 4.8
Azuki bean 23.0 ± 4.8 24.4 ± 4.6n.s. 25.6 ± 3.6n.s. 22.5 ± 3.0n.s. 20.1 ± 4.6n.s. 21.9 ± 2.8
Average mesophyl cell size (μm2) Soybean 450 ± 54 671 ± 93* 917 ± 137* 533 ± 82n.s. 688 ± 72n.s. 668 ± 54n.s. 690 ± 211 810 ± 145** 652 ± 88 1178 ± 203
French bean 503 ± 136 906 ± 156n.s. 1081 ± 212n.s. 716 ± 130n.s. 735 ± 220n.s. 1081 ± 87
Azuki bean 446 ± 49 575 ± 35* 699 ± 81n.s. 497 ± 52n.s. 551 ± 58n.s. 585 ± 84

Abbreviations are as in Fig. 1. Leaf mass per area (LMA), structural LMA (sLMA), leaf thickness, intercellular air space and average mesophyll cell size of Ct, De, LN, LNDe and HL in all the species were obtained at 6 days after the treatments (DAT), and those of Ct and De in soybean were also obtained at 10 and 15 DAT.

Values are means ± s.d. (n = 6–12). Values of Ct were compared with those of De, LN, LNDe and HL by Dunnett’s test (*P < 0.05, n.s. P > 0.05) following ANOVA. Values of Ct and De in soybean at 10 and 15 DAT were compared by Student’s t-test (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, n.s. P > 0.05).