Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: Pac Symp Biocomput. 2019;24:66–75.

Table 1.

Prediction performance in different experiment designs

Window size 80 100 200
Stride
20
40
80
20
40
80
20
40
80
Experiment ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Precision_d1
0.572 0.625 0.626 0.609 0.622 0.588 0.465 0.547 0.618
Recall_d1
0.493 0.498 0.447 0.486 0.513 0.529 0.602 0.582 0.584
MCC_d1
0.442 0.478 0.450 0.462 0.485 0.472 0.415 0.471 0.520
Precision_d2
0.608 0.655 0.650 0.652 0.653 0.623 0.496 0.576 0.654
Recall_d2
0.361 0.338 0.291 0.346 0.366 0.365 0.473 0.443 0.426
MCC_d2
0.361 0.374 0.341 0.377 0.391 0.372 0.341 0.386 0.426
Precision_d3+
0.639 0.670 0.661 0.675 0.668 0.629 0.543 0.598 0.669
Recall_d3+
0.357 0.297 0.245 0.315 0.330 0.310 0.453 0.418 0.381
MCC_d3+
0.360 0.340 0.301 0.354 0.360 0.326 0.343 0.367 0.391
Precision_ALL
0.601 0.644 0.641 0.637 0.643 0.607 0.496 0.570 0.641
Recall_ALL
0.409 0.382 0.332 0.386 0.407 0.406 0.513 0.486 0.468
MCC_ALL
0.392 0.402 0.369 0.401 0.416 0.394 0.370 0.412 0.450