Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Human Behav. 2019 Jan 4;94:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.042

Table 3.

ANOVA results for Ladder differences between samples before (Model 1) and after (Model 2) entering demographic covariates

Model 1 Model 2

Sample
MTurk ref ref
UAS Internet Panel 1.66 1.50
Gallup 1.86 1.65
Age

 20–29 ref
 30–39 −.14
 40–49 −.23
 50–59 −.19
 60–69 .13
 70–80 .44
Gender

 Male ref
 Female .26
Education

 < High School Graduate ref
 High School Graduate −.04
 Some College −.06
 College Graduate .15
 Post Graduate .28
Race

 White ref
 Black .16
 Other .28
Marital Status

 Never Married ref
 Married .33
 Living with Partner .11
 Separated −.24
 Divorced −.06
 Widowed −.07
Income

 < $20,000 ref
 $20,000 - $34,999 .34
 $35,000 - $49,999 .57
 $50,000 - $74,999 .89
≥ $75,000 1.32
Constant 4.22

F-test F(2, 138,336)= 447.6*** F(23, 138,314)= 788.7***

Variance explained 0.6% 11.5%

Note. Only participants with complete data on all variables included in both models. UAS = Understanding America Study