Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar 14;11(8):1059–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.015

Table 3.

Cross-sectional associations between 3D measures of cardiac mechanics and 2D LVEF or E/e’ at the same visit

Median (IQR) 2D LVEF Beta (95% CI) P-value* E/e’ Beta (95% CI) P-value*
3D LVEF (%) 49.9 (43.6, 54.6) 2.5 (1.9, 3.1) 0.001 −0.3 (−0.6, −0.0) 0.026
GCS (%) −22.0 (−25.7, −18.5) −2.4 (−3.0, −1.8) 0.001 0.4 (0.1, 0.6) 0.009
GLS (%) −14.6 (−17.0, −12.3) −2.0 (−2.8, −1.2) <0.001 0.1 (−0.2, 0.5) 0.50
Principal strain (%) −25.4 (−29.0, −21.7) −2.6 (−3.2, −1.9) <0.001 0.4 (0.1, 0.7) 0.008
Twist (°) 9.0 (6.3, 12.5) 0.7 (0.1, 1.3) 0.019 −0.2 (−0.4, −0.0) 0.026
Torsion (°/cm) 1.1 (0.8, 1.6) 0.6 (0.1, 1.2) 0.029 −0.2 (−0.4, 0.0) 0.071
*

P-values are based on the Wald test.

All models were adjusted for 2D LVEF or E/e’ (depending upon the outcome of interest) at baseline, age, BMI, heart rate (time-varying), systolic blood pressure (time-varying), and time since baseline (modeled non-parametrically using cubic splines).

All echocardiographic parameters were standardized based on the interquartile range at the post-anthracycline visit. An example of the interpretation is noted in Table 2.

3D indicates three-dimensional; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; GCS, global circumferential strain; and GLS, global longitudinal strain.