Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Apr;46(4):e38–e41. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000938

Table 2.

2 × 2 contingency tables and performance characteristics of four algorithms (excluding outside cases) for the identification of incident syphilis among HIV-positive men who have sex with men, Boston, MA, 2016–2017.

Algorithm A Algorithm B
Chart review
Chart review
Algorithm Positive Negative Total Algorithm Positive Negative Total
Positive 136 5 141 Positive 143 6 149
Negative 44 1526 1570 Negative 37 1525 1562
Total 180 1531 1711 Total 180 1531 1711

Sens, % Spec, % PPV, % NPV, % Sens, % Spec, % PPV, % NPV, %
75.6 99.7 96.4 97.2 79.4 99.6 96.0 97.6

Algorithm C Algorithm D

Chart review
Chart review
Algorithm Positive Negative Total Algorithm Positive Negative Total
Positive 166 4 170 Positive 169 5 174
Negative 14 1520 1534 Negative 11 1518 1529
Total 180 1524 1704 Total 180 1523 1703

Sens, % Spec, % PPV, % NPV, % Sens, % Spec, % PPV, % NPV, %
92.2 99.7 97.6 99.1 93.9 99.7 97.1 99.2

NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; RPR, rapid plama reagin; sens, sensitivity; spec, specificity