Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 8;9:134. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00134

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Univariate
analysis
Unit variable increase LC DFS DSS OS
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value
Age years 1.00
(0.98–1.01)
0.547 1.00
(0.99–1.01)
0.967 1.00
(0.99–1.01)
0.930 1.02
(1.01–1.03)
< 0.001
Histology 0.016 0.014 0.199 0.077
squamous vs.
adeno
0.48
(0.29–0.81)
0.006 0.54
(0.3–0.82)
0.004 0.65
(0.41–1.05)
0.077 0.63
(0.42–0.94)
0.025
other vs. adeno 0.77
(0.32–1.86)
0.559 0.72
(0.34–1.55)
0.77
(0.34–1.76)
0.541 0.74
(0.37–1.49)
0.403
FIGO stage < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
IIA+ IIB vs. IB 1.15
(0.58–2.28)
0.695 1.32
(0.76–2.31)
0.322 1.34
(0.72–2.50)
0.349 1.70
(0.99–2.94)
0.057
IIIA + IIIB vs. IB 2.72
(1.38–5.39)
0.004 2.63
(1.50–4.60)
0.001 2.98
(1.60–5.53)
0.001 3.36
(1.94–5.84)
< 0.001
IVA + IVB vs. IB 1.38
(0.58–3.33)
0.470 1.69
(0.85–3.35)
0.135 2.10
(1.00–4.40)
0.050 2.81
(1.49–5.29)
0.001
Lymphadenopathy 0.201 0.360 0.268 0.587
iliac vs. negative 1.38
(0.93–2.06)
0.114 1.22
(0.87–1.69)
0.249 1.14
(0.79–1.64)
0.482 0.85
(0.63–1.16)
0.853
PAO vs. negative 0.92
(0.51–1.66)
0.768 1.29
(0.85–1.97)
0.231 1.43
(0.93–2.21)
0.106 0.97
(0.66–1.42)
0.966
Time interval minutes 1.00
(0.99–1.01)
0.565 1.00
(0.99–1.01)
0.597 1.00
(0.99–1.01)
0.655 1.00
(0.99–1.00)
0.855
CEM43T90 minutes 0.93
(0.87–1.00)
0.035 0.95
(0.90–1.00)
0.053 0.96
(0.91–1.02)
0.155 1.01
(0.97–1.01)
0.491
TRISE degrees Celsius 0.67
(0.52–0.86)
0.002 0.75
(0.60–0.92)
0.006 0.73
(0.58–0.91)
0.006 0.80
(0.65–0.96)
0.016
IGBT use yes vs. no 0.41
(0.21–0.82)
0.011 0.56
(0.34–0.91)
0.020 0.38
(0.20–0.73)
0.003 0.43
(0.25–0.74)
0.002
MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
Histology 0.010 0.024 n.s. 0.071
squamous vs.
adeno
0.45
(0.26–0.78)
0.004 0.53
(0.33–0.85)
0.008 0.603
(0.39–0.94)
0.024
other vs. adeno 0.65
(0.29–1.46)
0.587 0.74
(0.34–1.62)
0.454 0.75
(0.36–1.54)
0.428
FIGO stage 0.010 0.002 < 0.001 < 0.001
IIA+ IIB vs. IB 1.50
(0.72–3.11)
0.278 1.69
(0.92–3.10)
0.090 1.82
(0.92–3.61)
0.086 1.98
(1.10–3.58)
0.024
IIIA + IIIB vs. IB 2.80
(1.34–5.84)
0.006 2.86
(1.55–5.27)
0.001 3.54
(1.78–7.07)
< 0.001 3.22
(1.77–5.85)
< 0.001
IVA + IVB vs. IB 1.74
(0.70–4.30)
0.233 2.03
(0.98–4.17)
0.055 2.45
(1.11–5.37)
0.026 3.38
(1.74–6.60)
< 0.001
Lymphadenopathy 0.031 0.051 0.011 n.s.
iliac vs. negative 1.81
(1.16–2.81)
0.009 1.42
(0.99–2.05)
0.059 1.48
(0.99–2.20)
0.057
PAO vs. negative 1.29
(0.70–2.39)
0.419 1.65
(1.05–2.58)
0.031 2.00
(1.25–3.19)
0.004
TRISE degrees celsius 0.65
(0.50–0.84)
0.001 0.72
(0.58–0.89)
0.003 0.71
(0.57–0.90)
0.004 0.79
(0.65–0.96)
0.019
IGBT use yes vs. no 0.43
(0.21–0.97)
0.019 0.58
(0.35–0.96)
0.035 0.41
(0.21–0.78)
0.007 0.46
(0.27–0.81)
0.006
CEM43T90* minutes 0.92
(0.85–0.99)
0.019 0.94
(0.89–0.99)
0.019 0.94
(0.89–1.00)
0.051 n.s.

Cox proportional hazard analysis for LC, DFS, DSS, and OS.

*

In multivariate analysis using CEM43T90, other factors showed similar results compared to results shown for TRISE.