Table 1.

Comparison of CRs for three values of PRD when the proposed approach is implemented using different wavelets at decomposition levels 3, 4, and 5.

Family	lv	Δ	PRD	CR	std	Δ	PRD	CR	std	Δ	PRD	CR	std
db5	3	47	0.65	24.03	5.44	36	0.53	20.25	4.54	29	0.45	17.53	3.95
	4	52	0.65	25.12	6.07	39	0.53	20.75	4.97	30	0.45	17.37	4.08
	5	53	0.65	23.31	5.51	39	0.53	19.22	4.48	30	0.45	15.49	3.84
coif4	3	47	0.65	24.28	5.59	36	0.53	20.47	4.56	29	0.45	17.76	3.98
	4	52	0.65	25.56	6.35	39	0.53	21.15	5.09	31	0.45	18.10	4.28
	5	53	0.65	23.73	5.75	39	0.53	19.61	4.59	31	0.45	16.39	4.17
	3	47	0.65	23.65	5.30	36	0.53	19.95	4.43	28	0.45	17.01	3.78
sym4	4	52	0.65	25.13	6.16	39	0.53	20.76	4.91	30	0.45	17.41.	4.10
	5	53	0.65	23.64	5.75	39	0.53	19.42	4.50	30	0.45	15.84	3.98
	3	47	0.65	24.66	5.39	36	0.53	20.94	4.66	28	0.45	17.80	3.93
cdf97	4	52	0.65	26.59	6.42	39	0.53	22.16	5.27	30	0.45	18.57	4.39
	5	53	0.65	24.98	6.06	39	0.53	20.69	4.83	30	0.45	16.75	4.20