Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 14;9:4564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40350-x

Table 3.

Comparison of the CR achieving PRD = 0.53 with method a) of the proposed approach for different values of the parameter PRD0.

PRD0 0.212 0.265 0.318 0.371 0.424 0.477
CRa 22.16 22.19 22.42 22.88 23.24 19.50
Δ 39 39 39 37 32 21