Table 5.

Comparison between the average performance of the proposed method and the method in¹² for the same mean value of PRD.

PRD	1.71	1.47	1.18	1.05	0.91	0.80
CR12	38.46	33.85	28.21	25.64	22.27	18.00
CRa	62.48	56.78	47.04	41.24	37.68	33.05
Gain %	62	68	67	61	69	84
CRb	60.33	53.07	44.37	40.29	35.69	31.86
Gain %	57	57	57	57	60	77
QS12	29.08	29.38	30.01	30.51	30.36	29.46
QSa	36.55	38.63	39.83	39.20	41.61	41.55
Gain %	26	31	33	28	37	41
QSb	35.86	36.81	38.33	39.16	39.96	40.80
Gain %	23	25	27	28	31	38
tc (s) a)	0.13	0.14	0.14	0.14	0.14	0.14
tc (s) b)	0.10	0.11	0.11	0.11	0.11	0.11
tr (s)	0.04	0.05	0.05	0.05	0.05	0.05
PRD0 a)	1.303	0.966	0.830	0.830	0.635	0.627
Δ a)	119	126	93	67	71	51
Δ b)	177	147	113	98	82	69