Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 8;7(3):e00557. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.557

Table 3.

Relationships between IL1R2 and IL1R1polymorphism and ONFH risk

SNP Model Genotype Control Case Before adjusted After adjusted AIC BIC
OR (95% CI) p avalue OR (95% CI) p bvalue
rs11674595 Codominant T/T 269 (61.3%) 147 (51.4%) 1 0.03 1 0.033 971.5 985.3
C/T 155 (35.3%) 125 (43.7%) 1.48 (1.08–2.01) 1.49 (1.09–2.03)
C/C 15 (3.4%) 14 (4.9%) 1.71 (0.80–3.64) 1.60 (0.75–3.42)
Dominant T/T 269 (61.3%) 147 (51.4%) 1 0.009 1 0.009 969.6 978.8
C/T‐C/C 170 (38.7%) 139 (48.6%) 1.50 (1.11‐2.02) 1.50 (1.10–2.03)
Recessive T/T‐C/T 424 (96.6%) 272 (95.1%) 1 0.33 1 0.420 975.6 984.7
C/C 15 (3.4%) 14 (4.9%) 1.45 (0.69–3.06) 1.36 (0.64–2.88)
Log‐additive 1.41 (1.09–1.83) 0.01 1.40 (1.08–1.81) 0.012 969.8 979
rs10490571 Codominant C/C 310 (70.5%) 172 (60.1%) 1 0.005 1 0.006 969.1 982.9
C/T 112 (25.4%) 105 (36.7%) 1.69 (1.22–2.34) 1.69 (1.22–2.34)
T/T 18 (4.1%) 9 (3.1%) 0.90 (0.40–2.05) 0.88 (0.39–2.01)
Dominant C/C 310 (70.5%) 172 (60.1%) 1 0.004 1 0.005 969.3 978.5
C/T‐T/T 130 (29.6%) 114 (39.9%) 1.58 (1.16–2.16) 1.57 (1.15–2.16)
Recessive C/C‐C/T 422 (95.9%) 277 (96.8%) 1 0.51 1 0.470 977.1 986.3
T/T 18 (4.1%) 9 (3.1%) 0.76 (0.34–1.72) 0.74 (0.33–1.69)
Log‐additive 1.35 (1.03–1.76) 0.027 1.34 (1.03–1.75) 0.031 972.6 981.8
rs3917225 Codominant A/A 196 (44.5%) 98 (34.4%) 1 0.02 1 0.022 969.9 983.6
A/G 182 (41.4%) 135 (47.4%) 1.48 (1.07–2.06) 1.50 (1.07–2.09)
G/G 62 (14.1%) 52 (18.2%) 1.68 (1.08–2.61) 1.65 (1.06–2.58)
Dominant A/A 196 (44.5%) 98 (34.4%) 1 0.006 1 0.007 968.2 977.4
A/G‐G/G 244 (55.5%) 187 (65.6%) 1.53 (1.13–2.09) 1.54 (1.13–2.10)
Recessive A/A‐A/G 378 (85.9%) 233 (81.8%) 1 0.14 1 0.170 973.4 982.6
G/G 62 (14.1%) 52 (18.2%) 1.36 (0.91–2.04) 1.33 (0.89–2.00)
Log‐additive 1.33 (1.08–1.64) 0.008 1.32 (1.07–1.64) 0.009 968.6 977.8

SNP: single‐nucleotide polymorphism; OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

a

p‐values were calculated from unconditional logistic regression analysis.

b

p‐values were calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis with adjustments for age and gender.

The bold values and p ≤ 0.05 indicate statistical significance.