Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004310. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004310.pub3

Sancho‐Cuesta 1993.

Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants Patients with advanced cancer, anorexia and weight loss
Interventions 50 patients MA 160 mg daily versus 50 patients 320 mg daily for 24 weeks
Outcomes Weight gain, side effects
Notes Loss to follow‐up not described
Cachexia was not defined
QS: 1
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of low risk or high risk
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of low risk or high risk
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk This study was not blinded
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The main outcome was weight. This is not a blinded study but the main outcome is not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk This is not a blinded study but the main outcome is not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Loss to follow‐up not described
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All the outcomes described in the study were reported
Other bias Unclear risk Report only from old conference proceeding