Sancho‐Cuesta 1993.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | Patients with advanced cancer, anorexia and weight loss | |
Interventions | 50 patients MA 160 mg daily versus 50 patients 320 mg daily for 24 weeks | |
Outcomes | Weight gain, side effects | |
Notes | Loss to follow‐up not described Cachexia was not defined QS: 1 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement of low risk or high risk |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement of low risk or high risk |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | This study was not blinded |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The main outcome was weight. This is not a blinded study but the main outcome is not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | This is not a blinded study but the main outcome is not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Loss to follow‐up not described |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All the outcomes described in the study were reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Report only from old conference proceeding |