Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 5;9(9):413. doi: 10.3390/polym9090413

Table 2.

Summary of thermal conductivity at room temperature and enhancement factor depending on the ceramics, the matrix, and the alignment method (‖ and ⊥ are values of the in-plane and through-plane directions, respectively).

Ceramics Matrix (Alignment method) Loading [vol %] Thermal conductivity [W/mK] Enhancement factor/Solution mixing [%] Ref.
AlN PP
(3D/Hot pressing)
30 0.81 23.2 [8]
10 0.37
Epoxy/Fe3O4
(2D/Magnetic force)
20 1.754 92 [53]
Al2O3 PE-g-AA/HDPE
(2D/Molding injection)
50 wt % 0.47 (‖)
0.305 (⊥)
17.5 (‖)
−15.3 (⊥)
[23]
SiC SiC fibre/air
(3D/Ice template)
6 0.54 (‖)
0.65 (⊥)
- [77]
BN_Fe3O4/Epoxy
(2D/Magnetic force)
40 5.77 (⊥)
2.25 (‖)
162 (⊥)
−34.8 (‖)
[68]
Si3N4 PE
(3D/Hot pressing)
20 1.20 (0.2 μm)
1.05 (3.0 μm)
0.94 (35 μm)
- [39]
BN PVA
(2D/Vacuum assisted)
94 wt % 6.9 - [57]
Epoxy
(3D/Fiber assisted self-assembly)
9.6 3.13 998 [4]
PVA/PVA_PDA
(2D/Doctor blading)
30 7.27 (‖)
8.8 (‖)
21.2 (‖)
13.5 (‖)
[56]
Epoxy
(2D/Magnetic force)
20 wt % 0.85 (‖) 104 (⊥) [52]
PVA
(3D/Ice template)
9.29 2.85 (‖)
2.40 (⊥)
112 (‖)
152 (⊥)
[45]