. 2017 Aug 14;9(8):360. doi: 10.3390/polym9080360

Table 3.

Comparison of analytical performance of different cadmium(II)-imprinted polymers used for SPE extraction.

Monomer or ligand	Detection system	Adsorption capacity (mg·g⁻¹)	Selectivity factor			LOD (µg·L⁻¹)	RSD (%)	Reference
Monomer or ligand	Detection system	Adsorption capacity (mg·g⁻¹)	Pd	Cu	Ni	LOD (µg·L⁻¹)	RSD (%)	Reference
2-VP ^a	ICP-OES	16.52	N.R.	N.R.	N.R.	0.14	2.6	[31]
4-VP ^b	FAAS	0.48	N.R.	N.R.	N.R.	0.11	2.9	[7]
ATU ^c	ICP-AES	38.30	9.46	2.86	6.42	N.R.	N.R.	[32]
TCPTS ^d	FAAS	44.7	2.44	3.64	N.R.	N.R.	N.R.	[33]
MAH ^e	ICP-MS	13.8	6.0	38.5	3.5	0.004	3.2	[5]
MAA ^f,AM ^g	GFAAS	46.8	3.17	2.97	2.57	0.05	4.8	This work

N.R. represents no reported; ^a 2-Vinylpyridine; ^b 2-Vinylpyridine; ^c Allyl thiourea; ^d 3-thiocyanatopropyltriethoxysilane; ^e N-methacryloly-(L)-histidine; ^f Methacrylic acid; ^g Acrylamide.