Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Stress Health. 2017 Feb 15;33(5):617–623. doi: 10.1002/smi.2748

Table 1.

Sample Characteristics

% (n) or mean (sd)

Male Soldiers (N=246) Female Partners (N=246) Male Partners (N=33) Female Soldiers (N=33)
Soldiers’ Years of Service 11.8 (6.0) 7.9 (4.6)Ϯ 11.1 (7.8)Ϯ 11.3 (4.0)
Soldiers’ Combat Exposure Score 32.2 (16.6) 23.7 (7.2)Ϯ 43.7 (18.9)Ϯ 23.2 (8.4)
Race/Ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White 80.9% (199) 88.6% (218) 69.7% (23) 75.8% (25)
 Non-Hispanic Black 4.5% (11) 1.2% (3) 9.1% (3) 3.0% (1)
 Hispanic 9.8% (24) 5.3% (13) 12.1% (4) 12.1% (4)
 Other 3.3% (8) 3.7% (9) 6.1% (2) 6.1% (2)
Education
 <HS – HS Grad 14.2% (35) 9.3% (23) 18.2% (6) 3.0% (1)
 Some College 59.8% (147) 41.5% (102) 42.4% (14) 48.5% (16)
 College + 26.0% (64) 48.4% (119) 39.4% (13) 48.5% (16)
Family Income $60,000 to $79,999 $60,000 to $79,999
Married 75.6% (186) 78.8% (26)
Cohabitating 24.4% (60) 21.2 % (7)
Age 33.3 (6.2) 32.0 (6.5) 34.3 (5.9) 33.2 (4.7)
PTSD Score 10.3 (11.8) 11.3 (13.8) 7.7 (11.4) 13.1 (13.8)
Marital Satisfaction 110.4 (28.4) 111.7 (26.4) 119.3 (21.6) 114.1 (19.2)
Ϯ

Sample size: 246 couples had male soldiers with combat exposure and 33 couples had female soldiers with combat exposure; a small proportion of couples were dual military (n=22 couples, 8.6%), resulting in a final sample of 257 couples. In addition, some partners had previous military experience.