Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 29;30(3):444–454. doi: 10.1177/0956797618822524

Table 2.

Results From Study 2: Descriptive Statistics for Participants Classified as Eminent in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM; n = 124)

STEM leader criterion Participants (n)
Percentage of eminent participants
Males Females Total
Tenured professor at R1 or international equivalent 40 21 61 49.2
 Associate professor 8 7 15 12.1
 Full professor 32 14 46 37.1
STEM Fortune 500 company senior executive 2 2 4 3.2
Senior position in government ≥ GS-14 or equivalent scale 6 7 13 10.5
 GS-14 0 1 1 .8
 GS-15 2 4 6 4.8
 Executive scale 0 1 1 .8
 Other scales 4 1 5 4.0
Patents ≥ 20 12 5 17 13.7
Publications ≥ 75 35 15 50 40.3
 Median number of publications 60
 Median h-index 22
NIH/NSF grants ≥ $2.75 million 31 12 43 34.7
 Median grant number 3
 Median grant total $825K
Othera 3 2 5 4.0

Note: Individuals who met multiple criteria (e.g., a full professor with 75 or more publications and government funding of at least $2.75 million) were counted in all categories for which they met the criteria. R1 = research-intensive university; NIH = National Institutes of Health; NSF = National Science Foundation.

a

The “other” group includes STEM leaders who are exceptions to the six criteria. These include an astronaut, a researcher who has multiple Nature and Science publications and over $3 million in nongovernment grants, a senior executive at a company that works on high-impact government projects, a full professor at a higher-research-activity university (R2) with both publication and funding totals just below our cutoffs, and a research supervisor in a national research laboratory who has over 60 publications.