Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 8;10:166. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00166

Table 2.

Performances comparison with different combinations of multi-omics data by pairwise paired t-test, according to concordance index among 5-folds cross-validation results.

Pairwise paired T-test
Set 2
ii iii iv v vi
t P t P t P t P t P
Set 1 i −0.784 0.477 −0.676 0.536 −0.832 0.452 −2.928 0.043* −3.315 0.030*
ii - - 0.406 0.705 −0.487 0.652 −0.092 0.931 −0.652 0.550
iii 0.247 0.817 −5.804 0.004* −2.710 0.054
iv −4.168 0.014* −3.603 0.023*
v −1.529 0.201

Note that a negative t-statistic indicated set 1 worse than set 2 in terms of performances. Multi-omics dataset applied as inputs: (i) mRNA-seq data (mRNA) (57 features); (ii) miRNA-seq data (miRNA) (12 features); (iii) integration of mRNA and miRNA (69 features); (iv) integration of mRNA, miRNA, copy number burden (CNB), and tumor mutation burden (TMB) (71 features); (v) integration of mRNA, miRNA, and demographical and clinical (diagnosis age, ER status, PR status) data (72 features); (vi) integration of mRNA, miRNA, CNB, TMB, and demographical and clinical (diagnosis age, ER status, PR status) data (74 features).

t-denotes the pairwise paired Student's t-test statistic, P denotes the p-value obtained. P-value < 0.05 are considered to be significant and indicated with * symbol.