Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 9;74(4):944–952. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky546

Table 4.

Apramycin activity in comparison with gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin and plazomicin against engineered E. coli strains expressing individual aminoglycoside resistance mechanisms

Resistance mechanism MIC (mg/L)
APR GEN AMK TOB PLZ
None 4 0.5 1–2 0.5 0.5
AAC(6′)-I 4 2 64 32–64 0.5
AAC(6′)-II 4 64 8 32–64 1
AAC(3)-I 8 >64 1–2 1 0.5–1
AAC(3)-II 8 >64 1 32 4
AAC(3)-III 4 >64 0.5–1 >64 0.5
AAC(3)-IV >64 2 1–2 2 0.5
AAC(3)-VI 4 >64 1–2 4 1
AAC(2′)-I 2–4 4 1–2 8–16 8–16
APH(3′)-I 2 1–2 1–2 8 0.5
APH(3′)-II 4 0.5 8 0.5 0.5
APH(3′)-III 4 0.5 32 4–8 0.5
APH(3′)-VI 4 0.5 64 0.5 0.5–1
APH(2′′)-II 2–4 >64 2–4 64 8
APH(2′′)-IV 4 >64 1–2 32–64 8
ANT(4′)-II 2–4 0.5 1–2 0.5 0.5–1
ANT(2′′)-I 4 16–32 1 16–32 0.5
armA 2–4 >64 >64 >64 >64
rmtB 4 >64 >64 >64 >64
rmtC 2–4 >64 >64 >64 >64
rmtF 2–4 >64 >64 >64 >64

APR, apramycin; GEN, gentamicin; AMK, amikacin; TOB, tobramycin; PLZ, plazomicin.