Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 5;42(2):220–227. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1432307

Table 3. Efficacy data from the first to last session of IMT for each participant.

Subject number PImax, cmH2O (% predicted)a FVC, litres (% predicted)b PEFR, litres per second (% predicted)b
  First Last First Last First Last
1 44 (34.2) 38 (29.6) 1.96 (42.3) 1.43 (30.9) 3.54 (54.5) 3.12 (48.0)
2 30 (32.4) 30 (32.4) 1.63 (34.2) 2.10 (44.0) 1.87 (107.5) 3.13 (179.9)
3 63 (49.2) 92 (71.9) 2.40 (58.0) 2.66 (64.3) 2.68 (40.9) 3.55 (54.1)
4 73 (57.0) 79 (61.7) 2.38 (53.1) 2.75 (61.2) 4.40 (63.7) 4.74 (66.0)
5 56 (43.8) 66 (51.6) 3.38 (65.5) 3.59 (69.6) 5.51 (63.8) 6.04 (70.0)
6 40 (31.3) 64 (50.0) 2.37 (53.7) 2.19 (49.7) 4.28 (54.7) 3.54 (45.2)
7 109 (93.1) 102 (87.1) 3.08 (55.0) 2.73 (49.1) 2.54 (48.0) 3.71 (70.3)
Means 59.3 (48.7) 67.3 (54.9) 2.46 (51.7) 2.49 (52.7) 3.55 (61.9) 3.98 (76.2)

cmH2O = centimetres of water; FVC, forced vital capacity; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate; PImax = maximal inspiratory pressure.

aPercentage predicted values based on those reported by Sclauser Pessoa et al.29

bPercentage predicted values calculated on-line (Dynamic MT) http://dynamicmt.com/dataform3.html30 and based on those reported by Langhammer et al.31