Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;25(2):443–455. doi: 10.1007/s12298-018-00640-6

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Response of antioxidant defense pathway with different treatments in experiment I (ag) and experiment II (hn). CAT activity, µmol min−1 mg−1 protein (a, h); AsA content, µmol g−1 FW (b, i); APX activity, nmol min−1 mg−1 protein (c, j); MDHAR activity, nmol min−1 mg−1 protein (d, k); DHAR activity, nmol min−1 mg−1 protein (e, l); GR activity, nmol min−1 mg−1 protein (f, m); and GSH content, µmol g−1 FW (g, n). Treatments are the same as described in Table 1. Mean (± SD) were calculated from three replicates for each treatment. Values with different letters are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 applying Fisher’s LSD test