Table 1.
Treatments | FW (mg shoot−1) | DW (mg shoot−1) | Water content (%) | MDA (nmol g−1 FW) | Other aldehydes (µmol g−1 FW) | Electrolyte leakage (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expt I | Con | 72 ± 3.3a | 11 ± 0.1a | 85.0 ± 0.6a | 20 ± 1.8b | 0.28 ± 0.02b | 24 ± 7.8c |
S+R | 46 ± 6.3c | 9.8 ± 0.9b | 78.8 ± 1.2b | 47 ± 9.5a | 0.71 ± 0.07a | 85 ± 5.1a | |
S+A5+R | 65 ± 1.7ab | 10.2 ± 0.2ab | 84.4 ± 0.6a | 19 ± 0.8b | 0.23 ± 0.04b | 49 ± 2.4b | |
S+A10+R | 60 ± 2.2b | 9.8 ± 0.5ab | 83.6 ± 1.1a | 21 ± 0.8b | 0.21 ± 0.01b | 47 ± 2.4b | |
Expt II | Con | 383 ± 0.02a | 44 ± 0.7a | 88.5 ± 0.5a | 21 ± 0.5b | 0.24 ± 0.02b | 7 ± 0.8c |
S | 310 ± 0.03b | 37 ± 2.7b | 88.0 ± 0.6a | 27 ± 2.1a | 0.40 ± 0.08a | 44 ± 4.1a | |
S+A | 366 ± 0.04ab | 45 ± 4.4a | 87.6 ± 1.1a | 20 ± 3.3b | 0.32 ± 0.04ab | 28 ± 4.8b |
Mean (± SD) were calculated from three replicates for each treatment. Values with different letters are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 applying Fisher’s LSD test