Methods |
Multicenter, prospective, open, controlled and randomised trial comparing static incubation and pulsatile machine perfusion in expanded criteria donors |
Participants |
Inclusion criteria for donors (ECD)
Inclusion criteria for recipient
Exclusion criteria for recipient
Pregnant or breastfeeding women
People who have been incarcerated
Minors
Adults under guardianship
People who are not affiliated with the French healthcare system
People with HLA immunization whose HLA antibody specificities have not been determined
|
Interventions |
Static incubation
Kidneys in this group are conserved in University of Wisconsin (e.g., UW, Belzer® or Viaspan®), IGL‐1, or SCOT solution before being transplanted
Pulsatile perfusion
|
Outcomes |
DGF
Evaluate improvement in the glomerular filtering rate: 12 months after transplantation
Evaluate the recourse to dialysis: 3 months following transplantation
Evaluate the proportion of functional grafts (which allows for renal purification without recourse to dialysis): 12 months after transplantation
Evaluate patient survival: 12 months after transplantation
Stratify the analysis of regaining function and graft survival using Nyberg's classification in order to determine which risk groups would most benefit from pulsatile perfusion: 12 months after transplantation
Identify perfusion profiles of the machine, which predict regaining kidney function (absence of dialysis during the week after transplantation) and graft survival: 12 months after transplantation
Evaluate the medico‐economic impact of each conservation strategy in the management of patients who will benefit from marginal grafts: 12 months after transplantation
|
Notes |
Study marked as complete (www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01170910) but no results available despite attempted contact with the authors.
|