Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Biol. 2019 Feb 18;14(3):434–448. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.8b01070

Figure 5. A relationship between structure of cannabinoid ligands and their affinity.

Figure 5.

(a) Chemical structures of abn-CBD derivatives used in the experiments. (b, c) Changes in the fluorescence emission spectra upon titration with abn-CBDO and CBDO, respectively. Ki values were calculated by fitting the experimental data to the one-site saturation ligand-binding model. (d) Interactions of abn-CBDO inside the binding cavity of CRBP1 as revealed by the X-ray crystallography (PDB No. 6E5T). (e) Orientation of CBDO inside of the binding pocket (PDB No. 6E6M). The absence of a hydroxyl group in the para position in CBDO determines weaker interaction of this ligand with CRBP1. The 2FoFc electron density maps were contoured at 1.4σ. Ordered water molecules (W) are shown as red spheres; dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds. Distances are shown in angstroms.