Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Pain. 2019 Jan 9;23(4):800–811. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1348

Table 3.

Associations between study variables

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

CLBP patients (n = 437) 1. Age
2. Pain intensity −.377**
3. Depressive symptoms −.159** .289**
4. Pain expectancies 0.006 .080 .150*
5. Pain catastrophizing −.244** .436** .513** .265**
6. TS of pain −.011 .076 .015 .113* .171**
7. Opioid use −7.62** 10.82** 7.57** 2.65* 5.94** 1.62
Controls (n = 115) 1. Age
2. Pain intensity .121
3. Depressive symptoms −.059 -.089
4. Pain expectancies −.209* −.116 −.209*
5. Pain catastrophizing −.193* −.065 .348** .230*
6. TS of pain .208* .010 −.050 .053 −.129
Note:

* p < .05 ,

**

p < .001.

N = 552. Table presents results of correlational analyses between continuous study variables and independent samples t-tests for the categorical variable (prescription opioid use). CLBP patients = chronic low back pain patients; Pain intensity = current pain intensity; Depressive symptoms = Beck Depression Inventory-II; Pain catastrophizing = Pain Catastrophizing Scale, TS of pain = temporal summation of mechanical pain.