Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 4;36(2):255–266. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1323-1

Table 1.

Effect of biotin and pentoxifylline on the sperm motility pattern at various time intervals after processing by swim-up technique

Sample Time in hours Sample size (n) Total motility (%) Progressive motility (%)
Control Biotin Pentoxifylline Control Biotin Pentoxifylline
Normozoospermic 1 171 87.88 ± 0.74 90.11 ± 0.66 a 90.65 ± 0.60 b 72.55 ± 1.20 77.46 ± 1.04 b 78.74 ± 0.94 c
4 171 85.72 ± 0.92 87.64 ± 0.75 88.17 ± 0.76 71.67 ± 1.20 74.99 ± 1.03 74.76 ± 1.11
24 165 69.42 ± 1.70 73.20 ± 1.48 67.62 ± 1.91 51.29 ± 1.82 56.25 ± 1.80 49.61 ± 2.00 d
48 105 49.30 ± 2.57 53.26 ± 2.42 40.23 ± 2.63 a,e 32.19 ± 2.40 37.08 ± 2.43 25.44 ± 2.34 e
72 43 42.16 ± 3.64 43.95 ± 3.60 31.84 ± 3.50 d 24.84 ± 3.01 27.79 ± 3.34 15.65 ± 2.68 d
Asthenozoospermic 1 67 71.56 ± 3.04 77.84 ± 2.40 79.29 ± 2.37 53.13 ± 2.96 63.90 ± 2.47 a 63.78 ± 2.50 a
4 67 67.58 ± 3.17 75.03 ± 2.44 73.05 ± 2.87 48.20 ± 3.07 59.90 ± 2.51 a 55.60 ± 2.91
24 67 47.52 ± 3.88 54.52 ± 3.31 43.50 ± 3.68 31.11 ± 3.63 35.82 ± 3.26 25.64 ± 3.30

aP < 0.05

bP < 0.01

cP < 0.001 vs control

dP < 0.05

eP < 0.01 vs biotin