Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 16;17:33. doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0472-0

Table 2.

Comparisons of whole ovarian IHC staining of markers assessed in PCOS and control mice ovaries

Marker PCOS/ Controls N Mean Total Area (Sum Area) (μm2)(× 103) Percentage of Staining (Area fraction ROI) (%) Average Intensity of Staining (Mean Colour Intensity)
PAI-1 Controls 6 281 ± 264 7.86 ± 5.96 178.27 ± 6.79
PCOS 6 323 ± 266 13.90 ± 10.57 177.07 ± 8.40
tPA Controls 6 17 ± 22 0.63 ± 0.79 172.90 ± 6.02
PCOS 6 8 ± 10 0.29 ± 0.38 169.73 ± 4.20
uPA Controls 6 227 ± 174 7.61 ± 5.72 164.58 ± 6.57
PCOS 6 155 ± 125 6.86 ± 5.37 163.43 ± 4.04
Plasminogen/Plasmin NBP2–19859 Controls 6 271 ± 183 7.21 ± 4.09 178.95 ± 3.18
PCOS 6 193 ± 79 8.64 ± 3.53 180.70 ± 6.25
Plasminogen NB300–544 Controls 6 1147 ± 1092 38.93 ± 23.14 165.16 ± 5.09
PCOS 6 936 ± 646 41.10 ± 23.38 162.72 ± 8.75

Mean ± SD are represented for all values. PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator; uPA, urokinase plasminogen activator; ROI, region of interest; N = number of mice ovarian sections or number of mice evaluated (one ovarian section per mouse)