Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jan 15;25(6):1756–1765. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2967

Table 1.

Patient and exam features

Patient/Exam feature Eligible (N=106) Final analysis set (N=67)
Age at enrollment (years)
    Mean ± standard deviation 48.9 ± 12.0 48.9 ± 12.2
    Median (range) 47.5 (24.0–75.0) 49.0 (24.0–75.0)
Number of BI-RADS 3, 4, or 5 lesions, n (%)
    1 77 (72.6) 57 (85.1)
    2 20 (18.9) 6 (9.0)
    3 7 (6.6) 4 (6.0)
    4 2 (1.9) 0 (0.0)
Clinical indication for MR imaging, n (%)
    Evaluate extent of disease for known breast cancer 47 (44.3) 32 (47.8)
    Further evaluation of lesion detected on other imaging 4 (3.8) 2 (3.0)
    Short interval follow-up MR imaging 6 (5.7) 4 (6.0)
    Screening due to personal history of breast cancer 6 (5.7) 5 (7.5)
    Screening due to genetic risk or family history of breast cancer 24 (22.6) 12 (17.9)
    Other clinical indication 9 (8.5) 7 (10.4)
    Multiple clinical indications 10 (9.4) 5 (7.5)
MR (B₀) field strength (tesla, T), n (%)
    1.5 T 42 (39.6) 27 (40.3)
    3.0 T 64 (60.4) 40 (59.7)
MR vendor platform, n (%)
    Philips 1.5 T 26 (24.5) 14 (20.9)
    Siemens 1.5 T 4 (3.8) 3 (4.5)
    GE 1.5 T 12 (11.3) 10 (14.9)
    Philips 3.0 T 39 (36.8) 26 (38.8)
    Siemens 3.0 T 18 (17.0) 10 (14.9)
    GE 3.0 T 7 (6.6) 4 (6.0)