Table 1.
Summary of advantages and disadvantages of the approaches for lung boundary detection algorithms in CXR images
Algorithm | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Rule-Based Methods | Easy to implement | Produce rough solutions |
[23–25] | Sets sequential steps | Generally used as initialization of robust approaches |
Lower computational complexity | Poor generalization capability | |
Pixel classification | Based on low-level features | |
[11] | Lack of shape constraints | |
Deformable Models | Provides shape flexibility | Do not perform well at widely varying shapes |
[30–33] | Combines both low-level features and general shape of the lung | Require proper initialization for a successful converge |
[22, 34, 35] | The possibility of trapping at local minimum due to bone intensity | |
Hybrid Methods | Best part of the schemes are combined | Might require long training process |
[11, 36, 45] | Similar accuracy as in inter-observer accuracy | |
Deep Learning Methods | Similar accuracy as in inter-observer performance | Long training process |
[39, 41, 43] | Needs large set of annotated data | |
Higher computational complexity |