Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 28;2019:3971571. doi: 10.1155/2019/3971571

Table 2.

Demographic data.

Traditional method 3D printing method P value
Group 1 (n=9) Group 2 (n=7)
Age (year), M±SD 37.00±17.09 32.14±14.63 0.559a
Sex, n (%) 0.213b
 Male 6 (66.7) 7 (100)
 Female 3 (33.3) 0 (0)
BMI (kg/m2) 27.22±2.95 26.29±2.29 0.500a
Fracture classification, n (%) 0.515 b
 T-shaped + Pw 2 (22.2) 1 (14.3)
 Pc + Pw 1 (11.2) 1 (14.3)
 Pw 6 (66.7) 3 (42.9)
 Transverse + Pw 0 (0) 2 (28.6)
Affected side, n (%) 1.000b
 Right 6 (66.7) 5 (71.4)
 Left 3 (33.3) 2 (28.6)
Pw fragment size (%) 61.66±21.69 60.35±18.35 0.900a
Dislocation, n (%) 9 (100) 7 (100) n/a
Femoral head fracture, n (%) 0.633b
 no 5 (55.6) 5 (71.4)
 yes 4 (44.4) 2 (28.6)
Number of PwSP, n (%) 1.000b
 0 1 (11.1) 1 (14.3)
 1 6 (66.7) 4 (57.1)
 2 2 (22.2) 2 (28.6)
Number of PwBP, n (%) 9 (100) 7 (100) n/a
Number of PcP, n (%) 1.000b
 0 2 (22.2) 2 (28.6)
 1 7 (77.8) 5 (71.4)

Ac, anterior column; AcP, anterior column plate; BMI, body mass index; M±SD, mean ± standard deviation; n, patient number; n/a, not applicable; Pc, posterior column; PcP, posterior column plate; Pw, posterior wall; PwBP, posterior wall buttress plate; PwSP, posterior wall spring plate.

a Independent t test or chi-square test.

b Fisher's exact test.