Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet HIV. 2019 Jan 16;6(3):e155–e163. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30330-8

Table 3.

Effect of financial incentives on viral suppression at 6, 12, and 48 weeks

Proportion virally suppressed, n/N(%) Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) Adjusted* Odds Ratio (95% CI) Adjusted P-value
Intervention group Control group
Baseline suppressed
 6 weeks 147/153 (96%) 134/147 (91%) 2.38 (0.88–6.43) 3.62 (1.14–11.47) 0.03
 12 weeks 143/153 (93%) 128/147 (87%) 2.12 (0.95–4.73) 2.30 (0.99–5.30) 0.05
 48 weeks 144/153 (94%) 128/147 (87%) 2.38 (1.04–5.44) 3.00 (1.21–7.44) 0.02
Baseline unsuppressed
 6 weeks 16/48 (33%) 10/44 (23%) 1.7 (0.67–4.29) 2.01 (0.73–5.55) 0.18
 12 weeks 22/48 (46%) 21/44 (48%) 0.93 (0.41–2.10) 0.98 (0.40–2.38) 0.96
 48 weeks 32/48 (67%) 26/44 (59%) 1.38 (0.59–3.24) 1.40 (0.57–3.46) 0.46

Notes: results based on intention-to-treat analyses, viral suppression defined as HIV RNA <400 copies per mL

*

Adjusted for gender and median daily wage