Table 1.
Strengths, limitations and assumptions of each study design in estimating heritability (h2) of psychiatric disorders
| Study design | Strengths | Limitations | Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|
| National sibling design (h2–national) | Implicitly includes effects of common and rare genetic effects | No info on actual causal genetic variants | Equal shared sibling environment, also for half siblings |
| Psychiatric status based on clinical diagnosis | Needs large samples sizes (tens of thousands of cases) to be able to estimate heritability | Random mating | |
| Reflection of general population | |||
| No gene × environment interaction | |||
| No gene × environment correlation | |||
| SNP-based design (h2-SNP) | Based on measured genetic variants | Includes (a priori) tagged common genetic effects only | Random mating |
| No confounding with shared environmental factors | Needs large samples sizes (hundreds of thousands of cases and controls) to be able to extract small genetic effects | Reflection of general population | |
| Psychiatric status based on clinical diagnosis | No gene × environment interaction | ||
| No gene × environment correlation |