Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar;20(3):238–252. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1800122

Table 2.

Pooled associations between PM10 exposure, NO2 exposure and LBW in different subgroups

Subgroup PM10
NO2
n I 2 (%) OR (95% CI) n I 2 (%) OR (95% CI)
Study setting
 Non-Asian 9 74.0 1.07 (1.03–1.10) 8 45.3 1.02 (0.99–1.04)
 Asian 2 30.2 0.87 (0.71–1.05) 3 0.0 1.09 (0.99–1.21)
Study design
 Cohort study 8 72.2 1.06 (1.02–1.11) 9 39.8 1.02 (0.99–1.04)
 Case-control study 3 81.8 1.04 (0.99–1.10) 2 0.0 1.04 (1.01–1.07)
Exposure type
 Continuous 9 63.1 1.07 (1.04–1.11) 10 38.5 1.02 (1.00–1.04)
 Categorical 2 0.0 0.87 (0.76–0.99) 1 1.06 (0.89–1.26)
Data source
 Monitoring network data 7 75.1 1.05 (1.01–1.09) 7 44.5 1.01 (0.99–1.04)
 Land use regression model based on monitoring network data 4 79.7 1.07 (1.00–1.14) 4 0.0 1.05 (1.02–1.08)
NOS
 ≤7 3 76.8 0.99 (0.93–1.04) 3 0.0 1.11 (1.03–1.20)
 >7 8 62.3 1.07 (1.03–1.12) 8 31.7 1.01 (0.99–1.04)
Adjustment for smoking
 Yes 6 68.6 1.07 (1.03–1.11) 5 48.0 1.07 (1.00–1.15)
 No 5 78.0 1.03 (0.96–1.11) 6 2.8 1.02 (0.99–1.04)

n: number of effect estimates