Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Surg Res. 2018 Nov 15;235:395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.079

Table 5. Sensitivity Analysis: Effects on Ineffective Communication.

Dyad Exclusion: Exclusion of Surgery Attending – Surgery Resident (SA-SR), Surgery Resident – Scrub (SR-S), and Surgery Attending-Scrub (SA-S) Dyads; Non-Work Related Communication Exclusion: Exclusion of all communication not directly related to work in the operating room or other clinical care

Dyad Exclusion Non-Work Related Communication Exclusion
Any Ineffective Communication Event More Than One Ineffective Communication Event Any Ineffective Communication Event More Than One Ineffective Communication Event
Predicted p-value Predictor Likelihood (%) p-value Predictor Likelihood (%) p-value Predictor Likelihood (%) p-value Predictor Likelihood (%)
Familiarity 0.69 - 0.18 - 0.42 - 0.12 -
Score
Number of Communication 0.01 - 0.001 - <0.001 - < 0.001 -
Events
Across-Sex 0.65 - 0.03 0.94 - 0.11 -
Dyad Status
 MM (N=42) 1.7
 FF (N=29) 36.6
 MF (N=74) 3.3
Cross-Discipline 0.49 - 0.03 0.09 - 0.01
Dyad Status
 ID (N=28) 0.4 1.8
 AN (N=35) 2.9 4.3
 AS (N=37) 29.7 21.9
 NS (N=37) 35.8 30.5

IRR, Incident Rate Ratios; MM, Male-Male; FF, Female-Female; MF, Male-Female; ID, intra-disciplinary; AN, Anesthesiology-Nursing; AS, Anesthesiology-Surgery; NS, Nursing-Surgery

Note: Predicted likelihood not displayed for non-significant predictors of ineffective communication.

*

For mean familiarity score (4.45)