Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 11;10:127. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00127

Table 7.

Comparing analysis, the frequency of occurring US features of the thyroid lesion regarding maximal measurement ≤1 cm and >1 cm (p-values were calculated by Chi-square tests).

Parameter Analyzed feature Lesion >10 mm Lesion10 mm p-value
Benign (%) Malignant (%) Benign (%) Malignant (%)
Composition >50%Solid; Solid 78 (66.10) 40 (33.90) 32 (53.33) 28 (46.67) 0.098
Echo pattern Markedly hypoechoic 11 (39.29) 17 (60.71) 4 (26.67) 11 (73.33) 0.408
Echo pattern Hypoechoic 85 (63.43) 49 (36.57) 46 (56.10) 36 (43.90) 0.284
Margins Ill-define 21 (35.00) 39 (65.00) 11 (29.73) 26 (70.27) 0.592
Tall/wide >0.9565 67 (61.47) 42 (38.53) 40 (61.54) 25 (38.46) 0.993
Microcalcifications Present 42 (48.84) 44 (51.16) 14 (42.42) 19 (57.58) 0.530
Macrocalcifications Present 26 (46.43) 30 (53.57) 10 (55.56) 8 (44.44) 0.500
Thyroid capsule Infiltration; Deformation 32 (52.46) 29 (47.54) 1 (11.11) 8 (88.89) 0.030
“Halo” pattern Partial; No 111 (66.07) 57 (33.93) 51 (58.62) 36 (41.38) 0.241
Asteria Scale 3,4 64 (57.14) 48 (42.86) 23 (42.59) 31 (57.41) 0.079
Asteria Scale 4 15 (39.47) 23 (60.53) 7 (25.00) 21 (75.00) 0.239