Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 15;8(3):2058460119836255. doi: 10.1177/2058460119836255

Table 2.

Specimen thicknesses and imaging parameters for quality compared images.


DM

DBT
Dose DBT/DM
Thickness kV mAs Filter MGD ki kV mAs MGD ki
15 28 32 Rh 0.70 0.85 29 45 1.03 1.74 1.48
20 29 40 Rh 0.88 1.23 29 45 0.96 1.77 1.08
23 28 40 Ag 0.73 1.42 29 40 0.81 1.56 1.12
25 29 56 Rh 1.14 1.76 31 63 1.54 3.03 1.35
26 29 40 Rh 0.80 1.26 29 40 0.78 1.6 0.97
27 31 56 Ag 1.34 2.66 31 60 1.42 2.9 1.06
30 29 56 Rh 1.04 1.79 29 50 0.91 2.03 0.88
32 29 54 Ag 0.96 2.27 29 56 0.98 2.24 1.02
35 29 63 Rh 1.08 2.04 31 60 1.27 2.99 1.17
39 29 63 Rh 1.03 2.07 29 63 1.04 3.18 1.01
41 31 63 Rh 1.20 2.44 29 63 1.02 2.66 0.85
42 29 32 Rh 0.50 1.06 31 63 1.26 3.26 2.50
46 27 35 Rh 0.43 0.94 29 50 0.77 2.14 1.81
56 29 63 Rh 0.88 2.20 29 63 0.89 2.8 1.01
66 31 63 Ag 1.07 3.35 31 63 1.05 3.41 0.98
71 29 63 Ag 0.83 2.90 31 63 1.02 3.55 1.23
Mean 0.91 Mean 1.05 Mean 1.22
STD 0.25 STD 0.22 STD 0.42

In all studies, the target was tungsten and in DBT only Ag filtration was used. MGD and incident air kerma (ki) were estimated by applying the Dance model.