Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2008 Nov 6;44(1):14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.08.001

Table 1.

Characteristics of the full Hispanic sample and Mexican-American, male, and female subsamples with significance testing between males and females, weighted National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 – 2003

Full Hispanic
sample (95% CI)
Mexican- American
(95% CI)
Gender
Gender
differences
Male
(95% CI)
Female
(95% CI)




N = 1,614 N = 862 N = 827 N = 787
Outcome variables
Transition to sexual experience before
  age 18
65.9% (63.1 – 68.7) 62.7% (58.5 – 66.8) 69.5% (65.6 – 73.1) 61.9% (57.7 – 66.0) *
Contraceptive use at first sex 72.6% (69.6-75.4) 68.8% (64.5-72.8) 72.9% (68.8-76.7) 72.1% (67.7-76.2)
Condom use at first sex 60.8% (57.7 – 64.0) 57.7% (53.2 −62.1) 57.5% 53.0 – 61.8) 64.7% 60.1 – 69.1) *
Consistent contraceptive use at age 17 52.2% (47.5 – 56.8) 45.5% (38.9 – 52.2) 56.2% (49.9 – 62.4) 47.5% (40.7 – 54.3)
Consistent condom use at age 17 44.9% (40.2 – 49.6) 43.1% (36.4 – 50.1) 54.5% (48.1 −60.8) 34.4% (28.2 – 41.1) ***
Transition to a live birth before age 20 19.5% (17.1 – 22.3) 19.7% (16.5 – 23.2) 12.1% (9.5 – 15.3) 28.2% (24.8 – 32.8) ***
Multiple live births 8.5% (6.9 – 10.4) 13.0% (10.2 – 16.5) 5.2% (3.5 – 7.5) 12.3% (9.6 – 15.6) ***
Immigration measures
Generation status *
 1st generation 14.9% (10.3 – 18.3) 16.5% (13.8 – 19.7) 13.9% (10.3 – 18.8) 16.1% (12.5 – 20.9)
 2nd generation 38.4% (33.9 – 43.3) 45.4% (41.2 – 49.6) 39.7% (32.7 – 46.6) 36.9% (30.7 – 44.3)
 3rd generation 46.7% (43.6 – 49.7) 38.1% (34.1 – 42.3) 46.4% (42.2 – 50.6) 47.0% (42.6 – 51.5)
 Language status
Youth interview conducted in
  Spanish
3.9% (2.9 – 5.1) 6.4% (4.7 – 8.7) 3.6% (2.4 – 5.4) 4.1% (2.9 – 6.0)
 Parental interview conducted in
  Spanish
16.1% (14.1 – 18.2) 24.2% (21.0 – 27.8) 16.8% (14.1 – 19.9) 15.2% (12.6 – 18.2)
 Responding parent speaks a second
  language at home
46.6% (43.6 – 49.6) 47.8% (4.6 – 52.0) 47.7% (43.6 – 51.9) 45.3% (41.0 – 49.7)
 Youth and responding parent speak
  
only English
33.5% (30.6 – 36.4) 21.6% (18.2 – 25.5) 31.9% (28.0 – 35.9) 35.3% (31.2 – 39.7)
Country of origin
 Mexico 46.0% (43.1 – 49.0) 44.6% (40.6 – 48.7) 47.6% (43.3 – 51.9)
 Puerto Rico 9.3%(7.6 – 11.3) 9.8% (7.4 – 12.7) 8.8% (6.5 – 11.8)
 Cuba 4.1% (3.1 – 5.4) 5.3% (3.7 – 7.4) 2.8% (1.8 – 4.5)
 Central/South America 10.6% (8.3 – 13.6) 10.4% (7.3 – 14.6) 11.0% (7.8 – 15.5)
 Other 29.9% (26.4 – 33.8) 30.0% (25.5 – 35.4) 29.9% (25.1 – 35.6)
Covariates
Individual characteristics
Male 53.1% (56.0 – 50.1) 51.5% (47.2 – 55.7)
Age at baseline (12/31/1996)
 12 20.4% (18.1 – 22.9) 20.2% (17.1- 23.7) 18.8% (15.9 – 21.1) 22.2% (18.8 – 26.1)
 13 20.8% (18.5 – 23.3) 21.0% (17.6 – 24.7) 19.2% (16.2 – 22.5) 22.6% (19.1 – 26.5)
 14 19.3% (17.0 – 21.8) 19.6% (16.5 – 23.1) 18.7% (15.7 – 22.2) 19.9% (16.7 – 23.7)
 15 20.8% (18.5 – 23.3) 21.5% (18.3 – 25.2) 22.6% (19.3 – 26.3) 18.7% (15.7 – 22.1)
 16 18.8% (16.4 – 21.3) 17.8% (14.7 – 21.3) 20.7% (17.4 – 24.5) 16.6% (13.5 – 20.2)
Family/ household characteristics
Family structure
 Two biological/adoptive parents 57.4% (54.4 – 60.3) 60.7% (56.4 – 64.8) 59.5% (55.4 – 63.4) 55.1% (50.7 – 59.4)
 Single biological/adoptive parent 32.0% (29.3 – 34.9) 30.5% (26.6 – 34.6) 30.8%(27.1 – 34.7) 33.4% (29.4 – 37.6)
 Biological parent and other parent 10.6% (8.9 – 12.6) 8.9% (6.7 – 11.7) 9.8% (7.6 – 12.4) 11.5% (9.0 – 14.7)
Highest school grade completed by parenta
 Less than high school 31.1% (28.4 – 33.9) 48.2% (43.9 – 52.5) 30.8% (27.2 – 34.7) 31.3% (27.5 – 35.5)
 High school 30.2% (27.4 – 33.1) 26.0% (22.3 – 30.0) 29.1% (25.4 – 33.1) 31.3% (27.3 – 35.7)
 At least some college 38.8% (38.8 – 41.9) 25.9% (22.3 – 29.9) 40.1% (35.9 – 44.3) 37.4% (33.1 – 41.8)
Respondent’s mother had a live birth
 before age 20
29.7% (27.0 – 32.5) 34.3% (30.3 – 38.5) 29.3% (25.7 – 33.2) 30.1% (26.3 – 34.3)
Average annual household income (in
 $10,000)b
3.63 (3.4 – 3.8) 3.15 (2.9 – 3.4) 3.60 (3.3 – 3.9) 3.66 (3.3 – 4.0)
Number of siblings
 0–1 33.5% (30.7 – 36.4) 25.7% (22.2 – 29.5) 33.5% (29.7 – 37.6) 33.5% (29.5 – 37.8)
 2 26.8% (24.2 – 29.6) 23.9% (20.4 – 27.8) 25.9% (22.4 – 29.7) 27.8% (24.0 – 32.0)
 3 17.6% (15.4 – 20.0) 21.3% (18.1 – 25.0) 19.2% (16.2 – 22.7) 15.7% (12.9 – 19.1)
 4+ 22.1% (19.8 – 24.6) 29.1% (25.5 – 33.0) 21.4% (18.3 – 24.8) 23.0% (19.6 – 26.6)
 Rural 10.3% (8.6 – 12.3) 9.7% (7.5 – 12.5) 11.0% (8.7 – 13.9) 9.5% (7.1 – 12.5)
 Urban 87.4% (85.2 – 89.3) 86.7% (83.5 – 89.3) 86.6% (83.5 – 89.1) 88.3% (85.0 – 90.9)
 Unknown 2.3% (1.6 – 3.4) 3.6% (2.3 – 5.7) 2.4% (1.5 – 3.9) 2.2% (1.2 – 4.2)
Census region
 Northeast 14.0% (12.2 – 16.2) 1.6% (.8 – 3.1) 14.3% (11.8 – 17.4) 13.7% (11.1 – 16.8)
 North Central 12.3% (10.3 – 14.7) 11.5% (8.8 – 14.8) 12.8% (10.1 – 16.2) 11.8% (8.9 – 15.5)
 South 30.3% (27.7 – 33.1) 27.5% (24.0 – 31.3) 32.3% (28.6 – 36.3) 28.0% (24.3 – 32.0)
 West 43.3% (40.4 – 46.3) 59.4% (55.2 – 63.5) 40.5% (36.5 – 44.6) 46.5% (42.2 – 50.9)
Total 1,614 862 827 787
*

p < .05

***

p < 001.

a

Parental education measured for biological parent with higher level of education.

b

More than 5% of respondents had missing data on income (19%). In all analyses, for missing data we substituted the mean or mode of the nonmissing values. For these cases, we also included a flag variable to indicate missing data in the multivariate models.