Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: Bull Math Biol. 2013 Jan 5;75(8):1304–1350. doi: 10.1007/s11538-012-9787-0

Fig. 26.

Fig. 26

The effect of FSP diffusion. (A) The activation time of tumor invasion for three values of FSP diffusion coefficient (Ds). (B) The ECM degradation area: the area was estimated by calculating the area of the region where the ECM level is below a threshold (ρ<ρth=0.8). (C) TAP activity: the activity was estimated by the area of region where the TAP level is above the threshold Pt>Ptth=2.0 (. (D) The FSP level: the average value of FSP levels was estimated in the localized invasion region [48,52] × [56,58]