Table 2.

Odds ratios of race/ethnicity and 12-month prevalence of DSM-IV/CIDI mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders in the consolidated sample (N=21,024).

	Number with Disorder n/N, Weighted %, (SE)	Model 1a¹ OR (95% CI)	Model 1b² OR (95% CI)	Model 2³ OR (95% CI)
Any Mood Disorder
Asian	124/2234 5.7%, (0.81)	0.74 (0.53,1.04)	0.59 (0.42,0.82)^*	0.61 (0.43,0.86)^*
Black	432/6227 6.8%, (0.47)	0.72 (0.60,0.86)^*	0.70 (0.58,0.83)^*	0.63 (0.53,0.76)^*
Latino	368/3646 8.1%, (0.49)	1.04 (0.88,1.23)	0.89 (0.74,1.06)	0.78 (0.65,0.93)^*
White (ref. in Model 1a)	1026/8917 8.6%, (0.34)	1.00 (--)	--	--
White in nativity group 1	42/482 3.7%, (0.56)	--	0.51 (0.36,0.73)^*	0.52 (0.36,0.74)^*
White in nativity group 2 (ref. in Models 1b & 2)	984/8435 8.9%, (0.35)	--	1.00 (--)	1.00 (--)
F_{x,denom df}, p⁴	F₄,616=14.52, < 0.001	F₃,8.36E8=6.53, < 0.001	F₄,82E10=9.11, < 0.001	F₄,2.42E8=10.24, < 0.001
F_{x,denom df}, p⁴	F₃,462=7.70, < 0.001	F₂, 4.85E8=7.51, 0.001	F₃,462E9=5.60, 0.001	F₃, 2.23E8=2.70, 0.044

Any Anxiety Disorder
Asian	156/2234 7.7%, (0.92)	0.65 (0.48,0.90)^*		0.68 (0.50,0.94)^*
Black	781/6227 11.6%, (0.61)	0.80 (0.69,0.92)^*		0.73 (0.63,0.84)^*
Latino	488/3646 10.8%, (0.71)	0.90 (0.74,1.09)		0.79 (0.64,0.96)^*
White (ref.)	1694/8917 13.4%, (0.45)	1.00 (--)		1.00 (--)
F_{3,denom df}, p⁴	F₃,462=10.84, < 0.001	F₃,8.02E8=5.14, 0.002		F₃,2.09E8=8.05, < 0.001
F_{2,denom df}, p⁴	F₂,278=4.81, 0.009	F₂, 2.99E8=2.46, 0.086		F₂,1.21E8=0.56, 0.573

Any Substance Use Disorder
Asian	27/2234 1.1%, (0.27)	0.30 (0.16,0.55)^*		0.32 (0.17,0.60)^*
Black	169/6227 3.0 %, (0.29)	0.67 (0.52,0.87)^*		0.59 (0.46,0.74)^*
Latino	127/3646 3.6%, (0.52)	0.71 (0.44,1.14)		0.58 (0.37,0.92)^*
White (ref.)	456/8917 4.0%, (0.29)	1.00 (--)		1.00 (--)
F_{3,denom df}, p⁴	F₃,462=6.23, < 0.001	F₃,5.96E9=6.71, < 0.001		F₃,5.88E8=8.05, < 0.001
F_{2,denom df}, p⁴	F₂,278=7.92, 0.005	F₂,1.82E9=5.59, 0.004		F₂,7.63E8=2.67, 0.069

Note. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval, SE = standard error

Significantly different from reference group at the .05 level, two-sided test.

Model 1a controlled for age, sex, census region, urbanicity, strength of ethnic identity, language preference, and nativity.

Model 1b addresses significant interaction effects observed between race/ethnicity and nativity for mood disorder prevalence. Specifically, joint significance tests of interactions between race/ethnicity and nativity in Model 1a produced the following results: mood disorder (F₉,3.66E6 = 2.16, p=0.02), substance use disorder (F₉, 1.75E6 = 0.78, p=0.63), and anxiety disorder (F₉,1.04E6 = 1.39, p=0.19). Because no interaction effect emerged for anxiety or substance use disorders, Model 1b is identical to Model 1a for these types of disorders and no new results are presented in this column. An interaction effect between race/ethnicity and nativity was observed for mood disorder prevalence, so White respondents were split into two groups for Model 1b analysis. Race/ethnicity/nativity groups for White respondents included: 1) immigrant/first-generation American Whites (i.e., foreign-born or US-born with two foreign-born parents) and 2) second-generation American or later Whites (i.e., US-born with at least one US-born parent). As a result, nativity was excluded as a control variable.

Model 2 added education and personal earnings to the variables included in Models 1a and 1b.

⁴

Denominator of degrees of freedom adjusted for multiple imputation. Note that F-tests with three degrees of freedom (four degrees of freedom for mood disorder analyses) determine whether minority groups differ significantly from Whites; F-tests with two degrees of freedom (three degrees of freedom for mood disorder analyses) test for differences between/among minority groups.