Abstract
Excitonically coupled bacteriochlorin (BC) dimers constitute a primary electron donor (special pair) in bacterial photosynthesis and absorbing units in light-harvesting antenna. However, the exact nature of the excited state of these dyads is still not fully understood. Here, we report a detailed spectroscopic and computational investigation of a series of symmetrical bacteriochlorin dimers, where the bacteriochlorins are connected either directly or by a phenylene bridge of variable length. The excited state of these dyads is quenched in high-dielectric solvents, which we attribute to photoinduced charge transfer. The mixing of charge transfer with the excitonic state causes accelerated (within 41 ps) decay of the excited state for the directly linked dyad, which is reduced by orders of magnitude with each additional phenyl ring separating the bacteriochlorins. These results highlight the origins of the excited-state dynamics in symmetric BC dyads and provide a new model for studying the primary processes in photosynthesis and for the development of artificial, biomimetic systems for solar energy conversion.
Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION
Understanding the nature of the excited state in electronically interacting bacteriochlorin (BC) dimers is of great importance for understanding the key processes in photosynthesis, as well as for construction of biomimetic solar energy conversion systems. Photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) from the purple bacteria contain a special pair, i.e., electronically coupled bacteriochlorophyll dimers that act as initial electron donors.1–3 Similarly, light-harvesting antenna in photosynthetic bacteria are composed of excitonically coupled bacteriochlorins, and it is assumed that this coupling facilitates an ultrafast energy migration through the antenna.4,5 In both cases (special pair and light-harvesting antenna), electronic interactions bath-ochromically shift the absorption band of the involved BCs and therefore make them more efficient in the collection of solar radiation.
The partial charge transfer (CT) character of the excited state of the special pairs has been postulated for a long time based on theoretical calculations,6 and results from Stark spectroscopy and hole burning experiments7–11 (see also literature cited in ref 12). Subsequently, it has been shown that the CT character has a pronounced impact on the directionality of the electron transfer. Specifically, the reaction center has two electron-cascade pathways branching from this bacteriochlor-ophyll dyad, each constituent BC with its specific electron-cascade pathway.3,12 It has been postulated that the partial CT character of the special pair excited state, additionally enhanced by an asymmetry of the protein environment,13 contributes profoundly to the direction and rate of the electron transfer.8,14 This influence becomes evident when the special pair is replaced by a heterodimer (composed of bacteriochlorophyll and metal-free bacteriopheophytin) and protein mutations, which collectively greatly enhance the CT contribution to the lowest electronically excited state.12,15–17
The CT state also plays a role in the energy transfer within the light-harvesting antennas, both in photosynthetic bacteria18 and in plants.19–21 In addition, the CT state may play a role in energy dissipation in light-harvesting antenna.22,23
The direct investigation of the special pair in RCs and photosynthetic antenna is difficult due to the complexity of the natural system, which causes difficulties in studying and manipulating individual photoinduced steps.3 Therefore, utilizing synthetic models can greatly improve our understanding of the nature of the special-pair excited-state dynamics, specifically the role of interpigment electronic coupling and the specific environment provided by the protein matrix on the nature of the excited state. These models also help to narrow down the role of the special pair without the additional convolution of other surrounding molecules. Moreover, synthetic compounds, mimicking the function of photosynthetic apparatus, are potentially useful for developing artificial solar energy conversion systems.24–30 For these purposes, several types of porphyrin arrays have been developed, where an excitonic interaction between individual porphyrins occurs, such as directly linked,24,31,32 co-facial,33 and slipped co-facial25,34 dyads. These systems can efficiently mimic the light-harvesting, energy-transfer, and charge-separation functions of natural light-harvesting antennas and RCs. However, it is unclear whether all important aspects of natural systems are reproduced by porphyrin arrays. For example, although the CT state has been proposed to be coupled to the excitonic state in certain dyads,32,35 the majority of work, specifically the ones where such arrays are employed as models of natural light-harvesting antennas or special pairs, do not determine nor discuss the contribution of CT to their excited states.
Nature utilizes chlorophylls and bacteriochlorophylls as the key light-harvesting and redox-active units for light-harvesting antennas and RCs.1,4,5 The key structural difference between these pigments and porphyrins is the partial saturation of the core tetrapyrrolic macrocycles, either in one pyrrolic ring (i.e., chlorins in chlorophylls a and b) or in two opposite pyrrolic rings (i.e., bacteriochlorin in bacteriochlorophylls a, b, and g; see Figure 1).1,2,36,37 There are few model systems utilizing actual chlorins or bacteriochlorins as functional units. In the 1970s-1980s, Wasielewski,38–43 Boxer,44,45 and others46,47 developed models in which (bacterio)chlorins co-facial dyads show a solvent-dependent fluorescence quenching, which indicates a contribution of the CT state to S1. However, the degree of fluorescence reduction in polar solvents (and thus the degree of CT mixing) is much higher in nonsymmetrical dyads, with an inherent redox asymmetry, and much less for symmetrical ones.41,43 Moreover, in some of these dyads, there is no evidence for excitonic interactions between the macrocycles,43 whereas other exhibit a conformational flexibility, which complicates the analysis of the spectroscopic data.45,46 Recently, a semisynthetic bacteriochlorophyll dyad has been reported, where two Zn(IIelectronic coupling of both states. Both factors seem to betuned by the specific protein environment) bacteriochlorins were nrelative energies of the CT and excitonic states and (2) thecovalently held in close contact within a synthetic protein.48,49 Exciton coupling in dyads was confirmed by absorption spectroscopy and the CT character of the excited state was confirmed by Stark spectroscopy. The degree to which CT mixes with the excitonic state depends on (l) the relative energies of the CT and excitonic states and (2) the electronic coupling of both states. Both factors seem to be tuned by the specific protein environment.49 The mixing of CT and Sl states has been also proposed for symmetrical synthetic conjugated chlorin—chlorin50 and directly linked chlorin—porphyrin dyads.51 In all of the later cases, it has been proposed that the mixing of CT with Sl results in very fast nonradiative deactivation of the excited state in polar solvents, whereas actual charge-separated state is not observed.
Figure 1.

(a) Structure of porphyrin, chlorin, and bacteriochlorin. (b) Dyads and monomer investigated in this work.
Bacteriochlorins (BCs) are attractive candidates for solar energy conversion due to their multiple absorption bands in the ultraviolet, visible, and near-IR spectral ranges that overlap well with the sun’s spectrum.1,36,37 There are crucial electronic differences between fully conjugated porphyrins and the partially saturated BCs (Figure 1). The partial saturation in BCs results in significant changes in their electronic structure,52 making BCs more efficient in absorbing near-IR light, easier to oxidize, and harder to reduce than their porphyrin analogues.53 Overall, the electronic, optical, and redox properties of natural bacteriochlorophylls are more closely mimicked by synthetic bacteriochlorins than by porphyrins.37 Moreover, a recent computational study on the charge transfer (CT) in a series of porphyrin, chlorin, and BC dyads has shown that BC dyads are associated with the highest rate for photoinduced charge separation process and with the lowest rate for charge recombination of the three dyads in the series.54 Taken together, the BC arrays can serve as a reliable model of natural bacteriochlorophyll-containing photosynthetic systems.
Contrary to the widely investigated porphyrins,55 only a handful of studies on synthetic BC arrays have been reported so far.36,38,48,49,56−61 We recently reported a series of symmetrical strongly conjugated56,58 and directly linked59,60 BC—BC dyads. In these derivatives, a significant quenching of fluorescence in solvents of high dielectric constant was observed, which suggests a contribution of CT to the excited state. The quenching of fluorescence in strongly conjugated BC dyads has been attributed to the enhanced S1 → S0 internal conversion caused by a contribution of charge-resonance configuration to the excited state in polar solvents.58 However, the dynamics of the excited state in symmetrical, meso-meso directly linked, and weakly coupled BC dyads and the reason for the significant reduction in fluorescence in polar solvents have not yet been investigated.
Here, femtosecond time-resolved spectroscopy and computation are utilized to investigate the photophysical properties of synthetic, structurally symmetric bacteriochlorin homo-dyads, exhibiting a different degree of electronic conjugation, BC1 — BC3,59 and a monomer, BC437,62 (Figure 1B). The monomer BC4 was used to compare how the dyad’s excited-state behavior deviates from that of the constituent monomers. The effect of the linker length and solvent on the excited-state dynamics is determined using time-resolved absorption, fluorescence, and computational analysis. In the low-dielectric-constant solvent toluene (ϵ = 2.38), the excited-state dynamics of the dyads are invariant of linker length and similar to that observed for the monomer (BC4). However, in the high-dielectric solvent N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, ϵ = 36.7), the excited state of the dyads is strongly quenched relative to the monomer BC4 or weakly coupled BC3. This quenching is attributed to charge transfer (CT) between the BC rings supported by computational studies, which confirm the relevance of the CT states in a solvent with high ϵ. These results provide an essential perspective to improve our ability in designing molecular systems that are effective in harvesting solar radiation for charge separation and give an insight into the excited-state properties of the bacteriochlorophyll special pair.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
The synthesis and basic spectral characterization of the target dyads BC1-BC359 and monomer BC437,62 were performed as described previously.
Femtosecond-TA (fs-TA) measurements were performed using a Clark MXR CPA-2001 laser that outputs 150 fs pulses of 780 nm light at a repetition rate of 1 kHz. The fundamental 780 nm light was split with 95% of the light sent through a TOPAS (Light Conversion) to generate the pump pulses at the desired wavelength and 5% was directed toward a motorized optical delay stage and then focused into a sapphire crystal to generate the white-light-continuum probe beam measuring the spectral range from 450–780 nm. The maximum time window of the experiment was instrument-limited to 3 ns. The time-resolved fluorescence measurements were performed using the same laser source as in the transient absorption measurements. The contour plots and kinetics were collected using an Optronis streak camera. The ground-state UV-vis absorption measurements were performed before and after each time-resolved measurement to ensure the samples were not degraded upon laser excitation.
Computations were performed following the previously reported protocol,63,64 which was used for a study of similar systems63 and has been benchmarked extensively. The applied approach implements the Fermi golden rule, which employs density functional theory with environment effects taken into account through polarizable continuum models. The dispersion-corrected range-separated hybrid ωB97XD functional and fragment-charge difference method were used for the calculation of the excited states and electronic coupling. DFT calculations if MOs, presented in Table S2, were performed in vacuum using Spartan 10 for Windows (Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine, CA) employing the B3LYP functional and 6–31G* basis set.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The optical properties of these dyads were characterized by first measuring the ground-state absorption (Figure 2). Comparing the position of the Qy peaks of each sample listed in Table 1, it is found that there are no major shifts when switching solvents, which demonstrates that the solvent polarity does not have an impact on the ground-state absorption properties. However, sequential addition of phenylene rings in the bridge position (BC1-BC3) shifts the absorption maxima closer to that of the monomer BC4. Increasing the number of phenylene bridge units lessens the electronic coupling between the BCs, leading to a blue-shift of the Qy absorption.
Figure 2.

UV-vis absorption of BCs in (A) toluene and (B) DMF. The directly linked BC1 (black) shows a red-shifted Qy band relative to the other dyads. As the number of phenylene bridge units are increased, the Qy band of the dyads blue-shifts toward that of the monomer BC4 (blue).
Table 1.
Absorption Maxima of the Qy Bands, Decay Dynamics of the Transient Qy Bleaching, Fluorescence Wavelength, Fluorescence Quantum Yield, Relaxation Lifetime, Relaxation Rate Constant, Fluorescence Rate Constant, Nonradiative Rate Constant, CT Rate Constant, and Back Electron Transfer Rate Constant of BCs in Toluene and DMF
| compound |
λQy (nm) |
τ1decay (ps)a | τ2decay (ps)a |
λfl (nm) |
Φflb | τrel (ns)b |
krel (×108 s- −1) |
kfl (×108 s−1) |
knr (×108 s−1) |
kCT (×108 s−1) |
kbet (×108 s−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toluene | |||||||||||
| BC1 | 731 | 4556 | 738 | 0.28 | 5.01 ± 0.03 | 2.0 | 0.52 | 1.5 | |||
| BC2 | 718 | 5633 | 725 | 0.22 | 5.10 ± 0.03 | 2.0 | 0.43 | 1.5 | |||
| BC3 | 717 | 6264 | 726 | 0.22 | 5.10 ± 0.04 | 2.0 | 0.43 | 1.5 | |||
| BC4 | 710 | 6419 | 712 | 0.19 | 4.94 ± 0.05 | 2.0 | 0.45 | 1.6 | |||
| DMF | |||||||||||
| BC1 | 730 | 41 ± 0.05 | 749 | 0.003 | c 240d | 0.73 | 2.1 | 240 | 240 | ||
| BC2 | 718 | 12 ± 1 | 1829 ± 30 | 727 | 0.07 | 1.88 ± 0.03 | 5.3 | 0.37 | 1.3 | 3.6 | 5.4 |
| BC3 | 716 | 33 ± 2 | 4731 | 725 | 0.16 | 4.84 ± 0.05 | 2.1 | 0.33 | 1.2 | 0.56 | 1.5 |
| BC4 | 708 | 45 ± 9 | 6549 | 714 | 0.17 | 4.98 ± 0.04 | 2.0 | 0.40 | 1.6 | ||
Extrapolated lifetimes were determined by fitting the exponential decay equation to a final y0 value of 0.
Φfl and τrel were determined in air-equilibrated solvents exciting at the maximum of the Qx band. Φfl was established using tetraphenylporphyrin in nondegassed toluene (Φfl = 0.07) as a standard.
τrel was instrument-limited at 50 ps; therefore, τrel obtained from fs-TA was used.
For BC1, krel was calculated using the lifetime of the Qy bleach from the fs-TA measurements.
The directly linked BC1 shows the largest dyad-induced shift, with the Qy peak centered at 731 nm, compared to the weakest coupled dyad, BC3, which absorbs at 717 nm. The slight bathochromic shift in the Qy band of BC2 and BC3 is ascribed to the substitution with a phenyl ring at the 15 position of the BC, a similar shift has been observed for an analogous 15-tolyl-substituted BC, for which . 59 The Qy peak of BC1 is also split, with its weaker second absorption centered at 706 nm. This splitting can be attributed to the excitonic coupling between BC macrocycles.65 Overall, the bathochromic shift of Qy band is caused by two factors— substitution by a large aromatic BC system at the 15-position of BC and the excitonic BC-BC interactions. The lower-energy transition at 730 nm is labeled ΨBC1+ and the higher-energy transition at 706 nm is labeled ΨBCr (Figure 3). The electronic coupling (V) between the monomer subunits in BC1 can be calculated as one-half of the energy splitting (observed or calculated) between both lowest-lying energy transitions, which we determine to be V = 242.2 cm-1. This V value indicates an electronic coupling of the BC units lower than that in bacteriochlorophyll special pairs (e.g., V = 550 cm−1 for P870 and V = 950 cm−1 for P960).66 However, V for BC1 is comparable to that reported for light-harvesting antennas (V = 300 cm−1 for B85066).
Figure 3.

(A) Comparison of the UV-vis absorption spectrum of BC1 dyad (black) and the most distant dyad BC3 (green). The dashed lines indicate the maxima of the absorption peaks. (B) Illustration of the excited-state energies of two BC monomers (ΨBC,mono) interacting to form the split BC1 Ψbci- (green) and Ψbci+ (red) excitonic states.
Based on the relative intensities of the split Qy peaks at 706 and 730 nm, the dihedral angle of the BC transition dipoles in BC1 was determined to be 57.5°. To determine the angle between the transition dipole of the two BC monomer constituents in the dyad, eq 165 can be applied, where IBCI± is the intensity of the two Qy absorption peaks of BC1, IBc4 is the intensity of the monomer, and θ is the angle between the two BC constituents. For BC1, the intensity of the 706 nm peak (ΨBC1_) is 0.3, whereas the peak at 730 nm is 1. However, there are two unknown variables in eq 1, IBC4 and θ.
| (1) |
Equation 1 can be separated to solve for both the plus and minus terms and rearranged to solve for iBC4, as shown in eqs 2a and 2b. Setting these two equations equal to one another allows to solve for θ, which gives 57.5°.
| (2a) |
| (2b) |
Additional support for strong electronic interaction in BC1 is provided by density functional theory calculations (Table S2). The calculations have revealed a splitting of the each relevant orbital (highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, HOMO-1, etc) into two new orbitals, with the same symmetries as the relevant orbitals in each monomer. This splitting can be interpreted as arising from linear combination of the relevant orbitals of each monomer, leading to the formation of “bonding” and “antibonding” excitonic orbitals. Such a splitting has been previously observed for strongly conjugated BC dyads, and it has been considered as a signature of a strong electronic interaction between macrocycles.58,60,61 As expected, such a splitting is observed only for BC1, whereas pairs of degenerated orbitals are present for BC2-BC3.
The shifts in the absorption spectra of BC1-BC3 show that the directly linked BC1 exhibits the strongest electronic coupling between the rings, which leads to its Qy transition appearing at a lower energy due to spatial proximity of the molecular orbitals of the BC macrocycles. The exciton interactions are due to the close distance of the BCs in the dyad and, because the relative intensities of these peaks are the same in both toluene and DMF, the exciton interactions are solvent-independent. The insertion of phenyl (BC2) or biphenyl (BC3) bridge between BC macrocycles causes a smaller bathochromic shift of the Qy band, and splitting is no longer visible, which collectively indicate that interpigment electronic coupling is much weaker than in BC1.
fs-TA spectroscopy67–72 was carried out to determine the excited-state relaxation dynamics of BC1-BC4. The fs-TA spectra of BC1 in DMF are shown in Figure 4A and the spectra for all BCs in both solvents can be found in Figure S2. All BCs show two bleach features that align with the Qx and Qy bands in the ground-state absorption spectra. BC1 has a transient absorption at 700 nm, which is not seen in the other dyads.
Figure 4.

(A) fs-TA spectra of BC1 in DMF at indicated delay times (noted in legend) after 500 nm laser pulse excitation. (B) Kinetic traces of the transient bleaching of the dyads BC1-BC4 in toluene and in (C) DMF, monitored at the Qy band transition.
The normalized kinetic traces of the Qy bleaching in toluene and DMF are shown in Figure 4B,C, respectively. In toluene, all BCs show similar decay kinetics with a lifetime of approximately 5 ns (Table 1). These decay dynamics reveal that relaxation from the excited state to the ground state in toluene is invariant to the linker substitution or linker length.
In DMF, however, the longer time component of BC1 and BC2 was quenched, and instead, a new, fast relaxation component was observed, whereas BC3 exhibits minimal quenching and behaves more like the monomer (Table 1). Because quenching is only observed in solvents of high ϵ, this implies the accelerated relaxation results from intramolecular charge transfer (CT) between the BC rings. The CT would either produce nonemissive cation/anion radical pairs, which are only stabilized in solvents of high ϵ, or cause a very fast internal conversion, which is manifested by a significant reduction in fluorescence.49,51
To understand the fluorescence properties, the steady-state fluorescence of these dyads were measured (Figure 5). In toluene, a blue-shift in the fluorescence wavelength maximum is observed as the distance between BCs in the dyads increased, in agreement with the ground-state absorption spectra. The fluorescence maximum changes by 9 nm for BC1 from toluene to DMF and all other dyads show smaller shifts of ≤2 nm. It is worth noting that for BC1 a weak fluorescence was observed at longer wavelengths ~770 nm in DMF (i.e., possibly from low-lying CT states). To the best of our knowledge, emissive CT states involving tetrapyrrolic macrocycles have not been reported to date. A convolution of three Gaussian fluorescence curves is presented in Figure S4, which reproduces the measured fluorescence spectrum of BC1 in DMF.
Figure 5.

Steady-state fluorescence spectra of the dyads BC1-BC3 and the monomer BC4 in (A) toluene and (B) DMF excited at 500 nm. All BCs have similar fluorescence in either solvent, except for BC1, which has a split peak in DMF, whose higher energy is similar to the monomer’s (BC4) fluorescence.
The fluorescence quantum yield (Φfl) of BC1 in DMF is reduced by 99% and that of BC2 by 70% compared to their quantum yields in toluene. The BC3 dyad shows 27% quenching when in DMF compared to when in toluene. As expected, the monomer BC4 shows little quenching of 9% when in DMF compared to the fluorescence in toluene. This quenching of Φfl indicates that in DMF, BC dyads exhibit a competing nonradiative deactivation mechanism, which depends on the distance between the BCs and the solvent dielectric constant.
For BC1 in DMF, two sharp emission peaks are observed, one at 711 nm and another at 749 nm. These two emission features are also observed for BC1 in toluene; however, due to large fluorescence quantum yield (Φfl) of the 749 nm peak of BC1 in toluene (0.28) versus that in DMF (0.003), the 711 nm peak appears as a small shoulder when BC1 is dissolved in toluene.
Figure 6 shows the fluorescence kinetic traces of the BCs in DMF and toluene, and the corresponding time-resolved fluorescence contour plots recorded with a high-speed streak camera are presented in Figures 7 and 8. Similar to the fs-TA kinetics, the fluorescence lifetimes of BCs in toluene are invariant of linker length and all dyads and the monomer have a relaxation time constant τrel of 5 ns (Table 1).
Figure 6.

Time-resolved fluorescence decay kinetics of BCs in (A) toluene and (B) DMF. Data were fit with single exponential decay equations and the obtained lifetimes are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 7.

Time-resolved fluorescence contour plots of BCs in (A-D) toluene and in (E-H) in DMF measured on a high-speed streak camera. From these plots, it is easy to notice trends in fluorescence decay. In DMF, fluorescence is quenched compared to that in toluene, with BC1 showing the largest decrease in fluorescence lifetime. In DMF, the shorter wavelength peak is hypothesized to be due a local excited-state emission and the longer wavelength emission due to the lower-energy excitonic state Ψbc+, which is strongly coupled to the charge-transfer (CT) state and as such quenched, owing to the additional relaxation pathway through the CT state.
Figure 8.

Illustration of the relaxation pathways for BC1 in DMF. Following excitation (blue) from the ground state to the excited state, BC1 relaxes to ΨBC1- (green) and then ΨBC1+ (red) states. From these states, radiative (solid arrow) and nonradiative (not shown) relaxations occur. The CT state (blue) primarily mixes with the ΨBC1+ state, which leads to accelerated nonradiative relaxation in high-dielectric solvents and possibly to the red-shifted, broad emission centered at 770 nm (see Figure S4).
In DMF, τrel is drastically reduced for BC1 (τrel < 50 ps). The fluorescence quantum yields Φfl corroborate the observed quenching of the fluorescence, which for BC1 is reduced nearly 100-fold in DMF compared to that in toluene (Table 1). The origin of this quenching is in the nonradiative relaxation from the S1 state to the CT state followed by electron—hole recombination and ultimately repopulation of the S0 ground state.
These CT properties are reduced upon the addition of the phenylene bridge due to the increased BC separation leading to nearly negligible electronic coupling between the macrocycles; therefore, the observed fluorescence occurs from the excited state localized on one macrocycle (i.e., fully decoupled state).
For BC1, the same emission peaks observed in the steady-state fluorescence measurements are found in the time-resolved data set too. However, τrel for the high-energy emission at 711 nm is solvent-independent. The minimal quenching of the emission at 711 nm, contrasted with the relatively short lifetime at 749 nm, indicates that the CT state primarily mixes with the lower-energy ΨBC1+ state.
The origin of the higher-energy emission is not 100% clear at this point. We can rule out the possibility that this is an impurity. The presence of similar peak in other directly linked BC dyads reported previously60 suggests that this is an inherent feature of this class of compounds. This emission is also rather unlikely from the higher-excitation state, given that typically a very fast (<1 ps) relaxation from the upper to the lower exciton state occurs.73 The presence of weakly fluorescent H-aggregates is also unlikely. The absorption spectra in the broad range of solvent are very similar and independent of the BC1 concentration. The presence of the long-wavelength emission band is also observed in a broad range of solvents, including one in which BC1 shows good solubility. Thus, the aggregation seems not to underlie any of the observed emission.
The key energetic parameters that control the CT process, i.e., the electronic coupling (Vel), reorganization energy (Ereorg), activation energy (EA), and driving force (ΔE), were also computed (Table 3). As the distance between BCs in the dyads increases, the calculated Vel decreases from 125.8 cm−1 in BC1, to 42.7 cm−1 in BC2, and 9.7 cm−1 in BC3. Furthermore, the EA for BC1 and BC2 are approximately 300 meV (2420 cm- ) and for BC3 is 463 meV (3734 cm−1). It is also found that the EA for CT increases from 88 to 127 meV with increasing distance. All of these factors contribute to the decrease in kCT upon the introduction of phenyl ring spacers (Table 3), in agreement with the experimental results.
Table 3.
Calculated Dyad Spacing (R), Electronic Coupling (Vel), Reorganization Energy (Ereorg), Activation Energy (EA), CT Driving Force (ΔE), Marcus CT Rate (km), and Fermi Golden Rule CT Rate (kfgr)
| compound | R (Å) | Vel (cm-1) | Ereorg (meV) | EA (meV) | ΔE (meV) | kMarcus (s−1) | kFGR (s−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC1 | 9.27 | 125.8 | 337 | 88 | −7 | 2.2 × 1011 | 6.2 × 1011 |
| BC2 | 13.60 | 42.7 | 282 | 93 | −42 | 2.2 × 1010 | 6.4 × 1010 |
| BC3 | 17.92 | 9.7 | 463 | 127 | −23 | 2.3 × 108 | 7.3 × 109 |
To further support the hypothesis of photoinduced CT within BC1-BC3, computational analysis was performed. The calculated solvated CT state energies are given in Table 2. In toluene, the CT state remains higher in energy than S1 because the solvation energy is insufficient to stabilize the CT states. On the other hand, in DMF, the CT state energy becomes approximately (within 0.1 eV) the same as the S1 state energy and mixing of these states can occur, leading to the quenching of fluorescence.
Table 2.
Calculated Gas-Phase Charge-Transfer State (EgasCT), DMF Solvation Energy (ΔEsol; Toluene Solvation Energy in Parenthesis), DMF-Solvated CT State Energy at the Equilibrium Ground-State Geometry (EsolCT) and CT State Geometry (EsolCT*), and Calculated S1 Energy Level
| compound |
EgasCT (eV) |
ΔEsol(eV) |
EsolCT (eV) |
EsolCT* (eV) |
Es1 (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC1 | 3.07 | 1.01 (0.52) | 2.06 | 1.72 | 1.72 |
| BC2 | 3.72 | 1.62 (0.89) | 2.10 | 1.82 | 1.76 |
| BC3 | 4.08 | 1.83 (1.01) | 2.25 | 1.79 | 1.76 |
The lifetime of S1 for the native special pairs has been estimated to be 180–350 ps,12 which is an order of magnitude shorter than those observed for BC1 in toluene (5 ns) but five times longer than that in DMF (41 ps). The lifetimes of S1 for both BC2 and BC3, either in toluene or in DMF, are an order of magnitude longer than those of the native special pair.5 It should be pointed out that the dielectric constant e in the close vicinity of the native RC was found to be e = 1.5–9, which is on average higher than that for toluene (2.38), but significantly lower than that for DMF (36.7). The dielectric constant has a pronounced impact on the mixing of the CT with the excitonic state by modulating the energy of CT and affecting the electronic coupling between both states.16,17,49 Reduction in the Φf for BC1 parallels the increase in e of the solvent (Table S1), thus it is reasonable to assume that the degree of CT mixing with the excitonic state strongly depends on ϵ as well. This result emphasizes the importance of the local dielectric constant on the photophysical properties of the excited state of the investigated BC dyads (Table 3).
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, we have shown that there is a substantial contribution of CT to the deactivation of the excited state in fully symmetrically arranged, electronically coupled BC dyads. kCT strongly depends on the distance and electronic coupling between the BC, i.e., kCT is reduced by nearly an order of magnitude with each phenyl ring inserted between the BC rings. Most importantly, the kinetics of the excited state of BC dyads strongly depend on the solvent dielectric constant e, which emphasizes the importance of amino acid composition in the special pair protein matrix on the pair’s properties. Although there are important differences between BC1-BC3 and natural special pairs (e.g., utilization of free-base BC versus Mg chelates, linear vs slipped co-facial arrangement of chromophores), it is hoped that the reported dyads represent models for naturally occurring special pairs, help to narrow down the role of the special pairs without additional surrounding molecules, and offer the opportunity for fundamental studies on the primary processes in natural photosynthesis, leveraging these systems for bioinspired solar energy conversion systems.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Center for Chemical Dynamics at Case Western Reserve University, NSF (CHE-1301109 to MP and CHE-1362504 to BDD). We are also grateful to generous resource allocations on the Ohio Supercomputer Center and the Kent State University, College of Arts and Sciences Computing Cluster. N.N.E. is a member of CBI Program at UMBC, supported by the NIH (Grant No. 5T32GM066706) and a member of the Meyerhoff Scholars Program at UMBC, supported by the NIGMS Initiative for Maximizing Students Development Grant (Grant No. 2 R25-GM55036).
Footnotes
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b02123.
Fluorescence quantum yields, femtosecond transient absorption, rate constant determination, charge transfer rates as function of distance, fit of the BC1 fluorescence spectrum in DMF (PDF)
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
REFERENCES
- (1).Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration. In Chlorophylls and Bacteriochlorophylls: Biochemistry, BiophysicsFunctions and Applications; Grimm B, Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, 2006; Vol. 25. [Google Scholar]
- (2).Blankenship RE Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis; John Wiley & Sons, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- (3).Zinth W; Wachtveitl J The First Picoseconds in Bacterial Photosynthesis—Ultrafast Electron Transfer for the Efficient Conversion of Light Energy. ChemPhysChem 2005, 6, 871–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Mirkovic T; Ostroumov EE; Anna JM; van Grondelle R; Govindjee; Scholes GD Light Absorption and Energy Transfer in the Antenna Complexes of Photosynthetic Organisms. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 249–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Croce R; van Amerongen H Natural Strategies for Photosynthetic Light Harvesting. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 492–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Parson WW; Warshel A Spectroscopic Properties of Photosynthetic Reaction Centers. 2. Application of the theory to Rhodopseudomonas viridis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6152–6163. [Google Scholar]
- (7).Moore LJ; Zhou H; Boxer SG Excited-State Electronic Asymmetry of the Special Pair in Photosynthetic Reaction Center Mutants: Absorption and Stark Spectroscopy. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 11949–11960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Meech SR; Hoff AJ; Wiersma DA Role of Charge-Transfer States in Bacterial Photosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.SA. 1986, 83, 9464–9468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Lösche M; Feher G; Okamura MY The Stark Effect in Reaction Centers from Rhodobacter Spheroides R-26 and Rhodop-seudomonas viridis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.SA. 1987, 84, 7537–7541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Lockhart DJ; Boxer SG Stark Effect Spectroscopy of Rhodobacter spheroides and Rhodopseudomonas viridis Reaction Centers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.SA. 1988, 85, 107–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Romero E; Diner BA; Nixon PJ; Coleman WJ; Dekker JP; van Grondelle R Mixed Exciton-Charge-Transfer States in Photosystem II: Stark Spectroscopy on Site-Directed Mutants. Biophys. J. 2012, 103, 185–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Laporte LL; Palaniappan V; Davis DG; Kirmaier C; Schenck CC; Holten D; Bocian DF Influence of Electronic Asymmetry on the Spectroscopic and Photodynamic Properties of the Primary Electron Donor in the Photosynthetic Reaction Center. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 17696–17707. [Google Scholar]
- (13).Steffen MA; Lao K; Boxer SG Dielectric Asymmetry in the Photosynthetic Reaction Center. Science 1994, 264, 810–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Heller BA; Holten D; Kirmaier C Control of Electron Transfer Between the L-Side and M-Side of Photosynthetic Reaction Center. Science 1995, 269, 940–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Kirmaier C; Holten D; Bylina EJ; Youvan DC Electron Transfer in Genetically Modified Bacterial Reaction Center Containing a Heterodimer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.SA. 1988, 85, 7562–7566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Harris MA; Luehr CA; Faries KM; Wander M; Kressel L; Holten D; Hanson DK; Laible PD; Kirmaier C Protein Influence on Charge-Asymmetry of the Primary Donor in Photosynthetic Bacterial Reaction Centers Containing a Heterodimer: Effects on Photophysical Properties and Electron Transfer. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 4028–4041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Kirmaier C; Bautista JA; Laible PD; Hanson DK; Holten D Probing the Contribution of Electronic Coupling to the Directionality of Electron Transfer in Photosynthetic Reaction Centers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 24160–24172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Ferretti M; Hendrikx R; Romero E; Southal J; Cogdell RJ; Novoderezhkin VI; Scholes GD; van Grondelle R Dark States in the Light-Harvesting complex 2 Revealed by Two-Dimensional Electronic Spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, No. 20834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Ramanan C; Ferretti M; van Roon H; Novoderezhkin VI; van Grondelle R Evidence for Coherent Mixing of Excited and Charge-Transfer States in the Major Plant Light-Harvesting Antenna LHCII. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 22877–22886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Novoderezhkin VI; Croce R; Wahadoszamen M; Polukhina I; Romero E; van Grondelle R Mixing of Exciton and Charge-Transfer States in Light-Harvesting Complex Lhca4. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 19368–19377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Romero E; Augulis R; Novoderezhkin VI; Ferretti M; Thieme J; Zigmantas D; van Grondelle R Quantum Coherence in Photosynthesis for Efficient Solar-Energy Conversion. Nat. Phys. 2014, 10, 676–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Müller MG; Lambrev P; Reus M; Wientjes E; Croce R; Holzwarth AR Singlet Energy Dissipation in the Photosystem II Light-Harvesting Complex Does Not Involve Energy Transfer to Carotenoids. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 1289–1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Kruger TPJ; van Grondelle R The Role of Energy Losses in Photosynthetic Light Harvesting. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 2017, 50, No. 132001. [Google Scholar]
- (24).Kim D; Osuka A Directly Linked Porphyrin Arrays with Tunable Excitonic Interactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 735–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Satake A; Kobuke Y Artificial Photosynthetic System: Assemblies of Slipped Cofacial Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines Showing Strong Electronic Coupling. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 1679–1691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Wasielewski MR Self-Assembly Strategies for Integrating Light Harvesting and Charge Separation in Artificial Photosynthetic Systems. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1910–1921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Trinh C; Kirlikovali K; Das S; Ener ME; Gray HB; Djurovich P; Bradforth SE; Thompson ME Symmetry-Breaking Charge Transfer of Visible Light Absorbing Systems: Zinc Dipyrrins. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 21834–21845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Whited MT; Patel NM; Roberts ST; Allen K; Djurovich PI; Bradforth SE; Thompson ME Symmetry-Breaking Intramolecular Charge Transfer in the Excited State of Meso-Linked BODIPY Dyads. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 284–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Giaimo JM; Gusev AV; Wasielewski MR Excited-State Symmetry Breaking in Cofacial and Linear Dimers of a Green Perylenediimide Chlorophyll Analogue Leading to Ultrafast Charge Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8530–8531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Wu Y; Young RM; Frasconi M; Schneebeli ST; Spenst P; Gardner DM; Brown KE; Wurthner F; Stoddart JF; Wasielewski MR Ultrafast Photoinduced Symmetry-Breaking Charge Separation and Electron Sharing in Perylenediimide Molecular Triangles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13236–13239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Aratani N; Kim D; Osuka A Discrete Cyclic Porphyrin Arrays as Artificial Light-Harvesting Antenna. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1922–1934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Ishii K; Yamauchi S; Ohba Y; Iwaizumi M; Uchiyama I; Hirota N; Maruyama K; Osuka A Evaluation of Charge Resonance Character in the Excited Triplet Dimers Studied by Time-Resolved Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Aromatic Ring-Bridged Porphyrin Dimers. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 9431–9436. [Google Scholar]
- (33).Harvey PD; Stern C; Gros CP; Guilard R The Photophysics and Photochemistry of Cofacial Free Base and Metallated Bisporphyrins Held together by Covalent Architecture. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007, 251, 401–428. [Google Scholar]
- (34).Balaban TS Tailoring Porphyrins and Chlorins for Self-Assembly in Biomimetic Artificial Antenna System. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 612–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Piet JJ; Taylor PN; Anderson HL; Osuka A; Warman JM Excitonic Interactions in the Single and Triplet State Excited States of Covalently Linked Zinc Porpyrin Dimers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1749–1757. [Google Scholar]
- (36).Lindsey JS; Mass O; Chen C-Y Tapping the near-Infrared Spectral Region with Bacteriochlorin Arrays. New J. Chem. 2011, 35, 511–516. [Google Scholar]
- (37).Yang E; Kirmaier C; Krayer M; Taniguchi M; Kim H-J; Diers JR; Bocian DF; Lindsey JS; Holten D Photophysical Properties and Electronic Structure of Stable, Tunable Synthetic Bacteriochlorins: Extending the Features of Native Photosynthetic Pigments. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 10801–10816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Wasielewski MR; Smith UH; Cope BT; Katz JJ A Synthetic Biomimetic Model of Special Pair Bacteriochlorophyll a. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4172–4173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Wasielewski MR; Svec WA; Cope BT Bis(chlorophyll)-cyclophanes. New Models of Special Pair Chlorophyll. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 1961–1962. [Google Scholar]
- (40).Pellin MJ; Kaufmann KJ; Wasielewski MR In vitro Duplication of the Primary Light-induced Charge-Separation in Purple Photosynthetic Bacteria. Nature 1979, 278, 54–55. [Google Scholar]
- (41).Pellin MJ; Wasielewski MR; Kaufmann KJ Picosecond Photophysics of Covalently Linked Pyrochlorophyllide a Dimer. Unique Kinetics within the Single Manifold. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 1868–1873. [Google Scholar]
- (42).Yuen MJ; Closs GL; Katz JJ; Roper AJ; Wasielewski MR; Hindman JC Photophysical Properties of Zinc and Magnesium Tris(pyrochlorophyllide a) 1,1,1-Tris(hydroxymethyl)ethane Triesters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 1980, 77, 5598–5601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Overfield RE.; Scherz A; Kaufmann KJ; Wasielewski MR. Photophysics of Bis(chlorophyll)cyclophanes: Models of Photo-synthetic Reaction Centers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 4256–4260. [Google Scholar]
- (44).Bucks RR; Boxer SG Synthesis and Spectroscopic Properties of a Novel Co-facial Chlorophyll-based Dimer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 340–343. [Google Scholar]
- (45).Bucks RR; Netzel TL; Fujita I; Boxer SG Picosecond Spectroscopic Study of Chlorophyll-Based Models for the Primary Photochemistry of Photosynthesis. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 1947–1955. [Google Scholar]
- (46).Hunt JE; Katz JJ; Svirmickas A; Hindman JC Photoprocesses in Photosystem I Model System. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2242–2250. [Google Scholar]
- (47).Vasudevan J; Stibrany RT; Bumby J; Knapp S; Potenza JA; Emge TJ; Schugar HJ An Edge-Over-Edge Zn(II) Bacteriochlorin Dimer Having an Unshifted Qy band. The Importance of π Overlap. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11676–11677. [Google Scholar]
- (48).Cohen-Ofri I; van Gastel M; Grzyb J; Bramdis A; Pinkas I; Lubitz W; Noy D Zinc-Bacteriochlorophyllide Dimers in de Novo Designed Four-Helix Bundle Proteins. A Model System for Natural Light Energy Harvesting and Dissipation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 9526–9535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Wahadoszamen M; Margalit I; Ara AM; van Grondelle R; Noy D The Role of Charge-Transfer States in Energy Transfer and Dissipation within Natural and Artificial Bacteriochlorophyll Proteins. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, No. 5287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Johnson SG; Small GJ; Johnson DG; Svec WA; Wasielewski MR Temperature and Solvent-Polarity Dependence of the Absorption and Fluorescence Spectra of a Fixed Distance Symmetric Chlorophyll Dimer. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 5437–5444. [Google Scholar]
- (51).Wasielewski MR; Johnson DG; Niemczyk MP; Gaines GL III; O’Neil MP; Svec WA Chlorophyll-Porphyrin Heterodimers with Orthogonal π System: Solvent Polarity Dependent Photophysics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6482–6488. [Google Scholar]
- (52).Gouterman M; Wagniere GH; Snyder LC Spectra of Porphyrins: Part II. Four Orbital Model. J. Mot. Spectrosc. 1963, 11, 108–127. [Google Scholar]
- (53).Chang CK; Hanson LK; Richardson PF; Young R; Fajer J π Cation Radicals of Ferrous and Free Base Isobacteriochlorins: Models for Siroheme and Sirohydrochlorin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1981, 78, 2652–2656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (54).Manna AK; Dunietz BD Charge-Transfer Rate Constants in Zinc-Porphyrin-Porphyrin-Derived Dyads: A Fermi Golden Rule First-Principles-Based Study. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, No. 121102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (55).Harvey PD Recent Advances in Free and Metalated Multiporphyrin Assemblies and Arrays; A Photophysical Behavior and Energy Transfer Perspective In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish KM, Smith KM, Guilard R, Eds.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, 2003; pp 63–250. [Google Scholar]
- (56).Yu Z; Pancholi C; Bhagavathy GV; Kang HS; Nguyen JK; Ptaszek M Strongly Conjugated Hydroporphyrin Dyads: Extensive Modification of Hydroporphyrins’ Properties by Expanding the Conjugated System. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 7910–7925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (57).Yamaguchi Y; Yokoyama S; Mashiko S Strong Coupling of the Single Excitations in the Q-like Bands of Phenylene-Linked Free-Base and Zinc Bacteriochlorin Dimers: A Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Study. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 6541–6548. [Google Scholar]
- (58).Kang HS; Esemoto NN; Diers JR; Niedzwiedzki DM; Greco JA; Akhigbe J; Yu Z; Pancholi C; Viswanathan Bhagavathy G; Nguyen JK; et al. Effects of Strong Electronic Coupling in Chlorin and Bacteriochlorin Dyads. J. Phys. Chem. A 2016, 120, 379–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (59).Esemoto NN; Yu Z; Wiratan L; Satraitis A; Ptaszek M Bacteriochlorin Dyads as Solvent Polarity Dependent Near-Infrared Fluorophores and Reactive Oxygen Species Photosensitizers. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 4590–4593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (60).Esemoton NN; Satraitis A; Wiratan L; Ptaszek M Symmetrical and Nonsymmetrical Meso-Meso Directly Linked Hydroporphyrin Dyads: Synthesis and Photochemical Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 2977–2988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (61).Shrestha K; Gonzalez-Delgado JM; Blew JH; Jakubikova E Electronic Structure of Covalently Linked Zinc Bacteriochlorin Molecular Arrays: Insights into Molecular Design for NIR Light Harvesting. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 9901–9913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (62).Krayer M; Ptaszek M; Kim H-J; Meneely KR; Fan D; Secor K; Lindsey JS Expanded Scope of Synthetic Bacteriochlorins via Improved Acid Catalysis Conditions and Diverse Dihydrodipyrrin-Acetals. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1016–1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (63).Lee MH; Dunietz BD; Geva E Calculation from First Principles of Intramolecular Golden-Rule Rate Constants for Photo-Induced Electron Transfer in Molecular Donor-Acceptor Systems. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 23391–23401. [Google Scholar]
- (64).Lee MH; Geva E; Dunietz BD Calculation from First-Principles of Golden Rule Rate Constants for Photoinduced Subphthalocyanine/Fullerene Interfacial Charge Transfer and Recombination in Organic Photovoltaic Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 9780–9789. [Google Scholar]
- (65).Kasha M; Rawls HR; Ashraf El-Bayoumi M The exciton model in molecular spectroscopy. Pure Appl. Chem. 1965, 11, 371–392. [Google Scholar]
- (66).Knapp EW; Fischer SF; Zinth W; Sander M; Kaiser W; Deisenhofer J; Michel H Analysis of Optical Spectra from Single Crystals of Rhodopseudomonas viridis Reaction Centers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.SA. 1985, 82, 8463–8467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (67).Burda C; Link S; Green TC; El-Sayed MA New Transient Absorption Observed in the Spectrum of Colloidal CdSe Nano-particles Pumped with High-Power Femtosecond Pulses. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 10775–10780. [Google Scholar]
- (68).Burda C; El-Sayed MA High-Density Femtosecond Transient Absorption Spectroscopy of Semiconductor Nanoparticles. A Tool to Investigate Surface Quality. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 165–177. [Google Scholar]
- (69).Braun M; Burda C; El-Sayed MA Variation of the Thickness and Number of Wells in the CdS/HgS/CdS Quantum Dot Quantum Well System. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 5548–5551. [Google Scholar]
- (70).Burda C; Link S; Mohamed MB; El-Sayed M The Pump Power Dependence of the Femtosecond Relaxation of CdSe Nanoparticles Observed in the Spectral Range from Visible to Infrared. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 3828–3833. [Google Scholar]
- (71).Lou Y; Samia ACS; Cowen J; Banger K; Chen X; Lee H; Burda C Evaluation of the Photoinduced Electron Relaxation Dynamics of Cu1.8S Quantum Dots. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 1091–1095. [Google Scholar]
- (72).Dayal S; Królicki R; Lou Y; Qiu X; Berlin JC; Kenney ME; Burda C Femtosecond Time-Resolved Energy Transfer from CdSe Nanoparticles to Phthalocyanines. Appl. Phys. B 2006, 84, 309. [Google Scholar]
- (73).Arnett DC; Moser CC; Dutton PL; Scherer NF The First Events in Photosynthesis: Electronic Coupling and Energy Transfer Dynamics in the Photosynthetic Reaction Center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 2014–2032. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
