Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 22;10(16):1589–1601. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26674

Table 1. Comparison of the differences in ASL-related biomarkers between HGGs and LGGs and between different glioma grades.

Biomarkers Number of studies Total sample size Heterogeneity Effect size Egger test to evaluate publication bias
LGG HGG P-value I2 SMD (95% CI) (*) P-value P-value
rTBF 15 237 323 <0.001 86% –1.46 (–2.00, –0.91) <0.001 0.17
rTBF mean 9 142 192 <0.001 86% –1.53 (–2.26, –0.79) <0.001 0.72
rTBF max 6 95 131 <0.001 87% –1.36 (–2.23, –0.49) 0.002 0.24
TBF 11 155 219 0.002 64% –0.82 (–1.20, –0.45) <0.001 0.05
TBF mean 4 51 70 0.50 0% –0.61 (–0.99, –0.23) 0.002 0.43
TBF max 7 104 149 <0.001 76% –0.96 (–1.53, –0.39) 0.001 0.10
II III
rTBF 4 62 48 0.26 25% –1.39 (–1.89, –0.89) <0.001 0.46
TBF 2 43 21 0.09 66% –0.90 (–1.85, 0.04) 0.06 (-)
II IV
rTBF 4 62 61 <0.001 87% –2.07 (–3.38, –0.76) 0.002 0.25
TBF 2 43 32 0.01 84% –1.44 (–2.76, –0.12) 0.03 (-)
III IV
rTBF 6 54 69 0.006 69% –1.05 (–1.82, –0.27) 0.008 0.19
TBF 4 27 40 0.64 0% –0.45 (–0.95, 0.05) 0.08 0.04

(*) SMD calculated as the difference between LGGs ASL-parameters and HGGs ASL-parameters (usually higher than the LGG counterparts).

(-) No pooled results due to low number of included studies.